Division of Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, Calif.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;74(2S):93S-100S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.020.
A publication in the August 2020 issue of the Journal of Vascular Surgery, "Prevalence of unprofessional social media content among young vascular surgeons," brought the concept of professionalism in the vascular surgery community to the forefront. In response to the methodology used in the article, and the definitions of professionalism, a global backlash from health care providers and lay people ensued. The article has since been retracted; however, its publication highlighted the need to reexamine current definitions and philosophies surrounding professionalism in medicine and surgery that may be discriminatory and exclusive. The term professionalism has no standard definition as evidenced by varying definitions among different societies and organizations. The lack of a structured, universally accepted definition of professionalism in the medical and surgical communities has resulted in no standard by which to measure the actions of physicians and surgeons. The definition of professionalism need not be complex and should not vary among specialties and societies. In its most simplistic form, the core definition of "professionalism" embedded in the volumes of publications, guidelines, and charters that exist on the subject of professionalism in medicine is respect. We propose a tiered approach to define professionalism in medicine that builds on fundamental principles of respect and inclusivity, and includes actionable steps at three levels: (1) individual, (2) organizational, and (3) societal. Through this approach, any physician, regardless of specialty, practice type or location, can apply these concepts to ensure they consistently embody what it means to be "professional."
一篇发表在 2020 年 8 月《血管外科学杂志》上的文章“青年血管外科医生不专业社交媒体内容的流行”将血管外科学界的专业精神概念推到了前沿。针对文章中使用的方法和专业精神的定义,医疗保健提供者和非专业人士对此进行了强烈反对。该文章随后被撤回;然而,它的发表强调了需要重新审视当前医学和外科学中围绕专业精神的定义和理念,这些定义和理念可能具有歧视性和排他性。专业精神一词没有标准定义,不同社会和组织对其有不同的定义。由于医学和外科学领域缺乏结构化的、普遍接受的专业精神定义,因此没有衡量医生和外科医生行为的标准。专业精神的定义不必复杂,也不应因专业和社会而异。从最简单的形式来看,嵌入在大量关于医学专业精神主题的出版物、指南和章程中的“专业精神”的核心定义是尊重。我们提出了一种分层方法来定义医学专业精神,该方法基于尊重和包容性的基本原则,并包括三个层面的可操作步骤:(1)个人,(2)组织,(3)社会。通过这种方法,任何医生,无论专业、实践类型或地点如何,都可以应用这些概念,以确保他们始终体现出“专业”的含义。