Suppr超能文献

结直肠癌肺转移切除术(PulMiCC)负担研究:PulMiCC 队列中 220 例患者肺转移局部治疗和全身化疗的分析。

The Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) burden of care study: Analysis of local treatments for lung metastases and systemic chemotherapy in 220 patients in the PulMiCC cohort.

机构信息

Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2911-2922. doi: 10.1111/codi.15833. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this work was to examine the burden of further treatments in patients with colorectal cancer following a decision about lung metastasectomy.

METHOD

Five teams participating in the Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) study provided details on subsequent local treatments for lung metastases, including the use of chemotherapy. For patients in three groups (no metastasectomy, one metastasectomy or multiple local interventions), baseline factors and selection criteria for additional treatments were examined.

RESULTS

The five teams recruited 220 patients between October 2010 and January 2017. No lung metastasectomy was performed in 51 patients, 114 patients had one metastasectomy and 55 patients had multiple local interventions. Selection for initial metastasectomy was associated with nonelevated carcinoembryonic antigen, fewer metastases and no prior liver metastasectomy. These patients also had better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores and lung function at baseline. Four sites provided information on chemotherapy in 139 patients: 79 (57%) had one to five courses of chemotherapy, to a total of 179 courses. The patterns of survival after one or multiple metastasectomy interventions showed evidence of guarantee-time bias contributing to an impression of benefit over no metastasectomy. After repeated metastasectomy, a significantly higher risk of death was observed, with no apparent reduction in chemotherapy usage.

CONCLUSION

Repeated metastasectomy is associated with a higher risk of death without reducing the use of chemotherapy. Continued monitoring without surgery might reassure patients with indolent disease or allow response assessment during systemic treatment. Overall, the carefully collected information from the PulMICC study provides no indication of an important survival benefit from metastasectomy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨结直肠癌患者在决定肺转移瘤切除术(metastasectomy)后进一步治疗的负担。

方法

参与肺部转移瘤切除术治疗结直肠癌(PulMiCC)研究的 5 个团队提供了有关肺癌转移灶局部治疗(包括化疗)的详细信息。对于三组(无肺转移瘤切除术、一次肺转移瘤切除术或多次局部干预)的患者,检查了基线因素和额外治疗的选择标准。

结果

这 5 个团队于 2010 年 10 月至 2017 年 1 月期间共招募了 220 名患者。51 名患者未行肺转移瘤切除术,114 名患者行一次肺转移瘤切除术,55 名患者行多次局部干预。初始转移瘤切除术的选择与癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen)不升高、转移灶较少和无既往肝转移瘤切除术有关。这些患者的东部肿瘤协作组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)评分和肺功能基线也更好。有 4 个地点提供了 139 名患者的化疗信息:79 名(57%)患者接受了 1 至 5 个疗程的化疗,共计 179 个疗程。单次或多次转移瘤切除术干预后的生存模式表明存在保证时间偏倚,这给人一种无转移瘤切除术有益的印象。重复进行转移瘤切除术时,观察到死亡风险显著增加,而化疗使用率没有明显降低。

结论

多次转移瘤切除术与死亡风险增加相关,而不减少化疗的使用。在没有手术的情况下继续监测可能会让疾病进展缓慢的患者安心,或者允许在全身治疗期间进行疗效评估。总的来说,PulMiCC 研究中精心收集的信息表明,转移瘤切除术没有明显的生存获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验