Suppr超能文献

由医师集团实践发起的捆绑支付病例:医疗保险受益人的护理质量感知。

Bundled Payment Episodes Initiated by Physician Group Practices: Medicare Beneficiary Perceptions of Care Quality.

机构信息

Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Abt Associates, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(5):1052-1059. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06848-9. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative incentivizes participating providers to reduce total Medicare payments for an episode of care. However, there are concerns that reducing payments could reduce quality of care.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of BPCI with patient-reported functional status and care experiences.

DESIGN

We surveyed a stratified random sample of Medicare beneficiaries with BPCI episodes attributed to participating physician group practices, and matched comparison beneficiaries, after hospitalization for one of the 18 highest volume clinical episodes. The sample included beneficiaries discharged from the hospital from February 2017 through September 2017. Beneficiaries were surveyed approximately 90 days after their hospital discharge. We estimated risk-adjusted differences between the BPCI and comparison groups, pooled across all 18 clinical episodes and separately for the five largest clinical episodes.

PARTICIPANTS

Medicare beneficiaries with BPCI episodes (n=16,898, response rate=44.5%) and comparison beneficiaries hospitalized for similar conditions selected using coarsened exact matching (n=14,652, response rate=46.2%).

MAIN MEASURES

Patient-reported functional status, care experiences, and overall satisfaction with recovery.

KEY RESULTS

Overall, we did not find differences between the BPCI and comparison respondents across seven measures of change in functional status or overall satisfaction with recovery. Both BPCI and comparison respondents reported generally positive care experiences, but BPCI respondents were less likely to report positive care experience for 3 of 8 measures (discharged at the right time, -1.2 percentage points (pp); appropriate level of care, -1.8 pp; preferences for post-discharge care taken into account, -0.9 pp; p<0.05 for all three measures).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of respondents with favorable care experiences was smaller for BPCI than comparison respondents. However, we did not detect differences in self-reported change in functional status approximately 90 days after hospital discharge, indicating that differences in care experiences did not affect functional recovery.

摘要

背景

改善医疗照顾支付捆绑计划(BPCI)激励参与提供者降低医疗照顾期的医疗保险总支付。然而,有人担心降低支付可能会降低医疗质量。

目的

评估 BPCI 与患者报告的功能状态和医疗体验的关联。

设计

我们对参与医生团体实践的 Medicare 受益人的 BPCI 事件进行分层随机抽样调查,并对住院的 18 个最高容量临床事件之一进行匹配比较受益人的调查。该样本包括从 2017 年 2 月至 2017 年 9 月出院的患者。受益人在出院后大约 90 天接受调查。我们在所有 18 个临床事件中分别对 BPCI 和比较组进行了风险调整差异的估计,并在五个最大的临床事件中进行了综合估计。

参与者

接受 BPCI 事件的 Medicare 受益人(n=16898,响应率=44.5%)和使用粗糙精确匹配选择的因类似情况住院的比较受益人的调查(n=14652,响应率=46.2%)。

主要措施

患者报告的功能状态、医疗体验以及对康复的整体满意度。

主要发现

总体而言,我们在七个功能状态变化或对康复的整体满意度测量指标中,没有发现 BPCI 和比较应答者之间的差异。BPCI 和比较应答者都报告了普遍积极的医疗体验,但 BPCI 应答者在 8 项措施中的 3 项报告积极的医疗体验的可能性较小(出院时间正确,-1.2 个百分点(pp);适当的护理水平,-1.8 pp;考虑到出院后的护理偏好,-0.9 pp;所有三个措施的 p 值均<0.05)。

结论

BPCI 比比较应答者的具有有利医疗体验的比例更小。然而,我们没有检测到大约 90 天后出院的功能状态自我报告变化的差异,这表明医疗体验的差异并没有影响功能恢复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验