Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, New York.
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Sep 1;126(3):743-762. doi: 10.1152/jn.00152.2021. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
Limb dominance is evident in many daily activities, leading to the prominent idea that each hemisphere of the brain specializes in controlling different aspects of movement. Past studies suggest that the dominant arm is primarily controlled via an internal model of limb dynamics that enables the nervous system to produce efficient movements. In contrast, the nondominant arm may be primarily controlled via impedance mechanisms that rely on the strong modulation of sensory feedback from individual joints to control limb posture. We tested whether such differences are evident in behavioral responses and stretch reflexes following sudden displacement of the arm during posture control. applied specific combinations of elbow-shoulder torque perturbations (the same for all participants). Peak joint displacements, return times, end point accuracy, and the directional tuning and amplitude of stretch reflexes in nearly all muscles were not statistically different between the two arms. induced specific combinations of joint motion (the same for all participants). Again, peak joint displacements, return times, end point accuracy, and the directional tuning and amplitude of stretch reflexes in nearly all muscles did not differ statistically when countering the imposed loads with each arm. Moderate to strong correlations were found between stretch reflexes and behavioral responses to the perturbations with the two arms across both experiments. Collectively, the results do not support the idea that the dominant arm specializes in exploiting internal models and the nondominant arm in impedance control by increasing reflex gains to counter sudden loads imposed on the arms during posture control. A prominent hypothesis is that the nervous system controls the dominant arm through predictive internal models and the nondominant arm through impedance mechanisms. We tested whether stretch reflexes of muscles in the two arms also display such specialization during posture control. Nearly all behavioral responses and stretch reflexes did not differ statistically but were strongly correlated between the arms. The results indicate individual signatures of feedback control that are common for the two arms.
优势肢体在许多日常活动中表现明显,这使得人们普遍认为大脑的两个半球专门控制运动的不同方面。过去的研究表明,主导手臂主要通过肢体动力学的内部模型来控制,这使得神经系统能够产生高效的运动。相比之下,非主导手臂可能主要通过阻抗机制来控制,这种机制依赖于各个关节的强烈调节感觉反馈来控制肢体姿势。我们测试了在姿势控制过程中手臂突然位移后,这种差异是否表现在行为反应和伸展反射中。应用特定的肘部-肩部扭矩扰动组合(对所有参与者相同)。在几乎所有肌肉中,两个手臂的关节位移峰值、返回时间、终点精度以及伸展反射的方向调谐和幅度都没有统计学上的差异。应用特定的关节运动组合(对所有参与者相同)。同样,在使用每个手臂对抗施加的负载时,在几乎所有肌肉中,关节位移峰值、返回时间、终点精度以及伸展反射的方向调谐和幅度都没有统计学上的差异。在两个实验中,我们发现伸展反射与对两个手臂的扰动的行为反应之间存在中度到高度的相关性。总的来说,结果不支持主导手臂专门利用内部模型,非主导手臂通过增加反射增益来对抗在姿势控制过程中手臂突然受到的负载的观点。一个突出的假设是,神经系统通过预测内部模型来控制主导手臂,通过阻抗机制来控制非主导手臂。我们测试了在姿势控制过程中,两个手臂的肌肉伸展反射是否也表现出这种专业化。几乎所有的行为反应和伸展反射在统计学上没有差异,但在手臂之间存在强烈的相关性。结果表明,反馈控制的个体特征对两个手臂都是共同的。