Yatabe Junichi, Yatabe Midori Sasaki, Okada Rika, Ichihara Atsuhiro
General Incorporated Association TelemedEASE, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
TM Clinic Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Aug 31;5(2):e27347. doi: 10.2196/27347.
The burden of time is often the primary reason why patients discontinue their treatment. Telemedicine may help patients adhere to treatment by offering convenience.
This study examined the efficacy and safety of telemedicine for the management of hypertension in Japan.
Patients with uncomplicated hypertension were recruited through web advertising between November 2015 and February 2017. They were then screened, stratified by office systolic blood pressure (SBP), and randomized into two groups: usual care (UC) and telemedicine. The telemedicine group used a 3G network-attached home blood pressure (BP) monitoring device, consulted hypertension specialists from an academic hospital through web-based video visits, and received prescription medication by mail for 1 year. The UC group used the same BP monitoring device but was managed using self-recorded BP readings, which included their diary entries and office BP taken in a community practice setting.
Initial screening was completed by 99 patients, 54% of whom had untreated hypertension. Baseline BP was similar between the groups, but the weekly average SBP at the end of the 1-year study period was significantly lower in the telemedicine group (125, SD 9 mmHg vs 131, SD 12 mmHg, respectively; P=.02). SBP in the telemedicine group was 3.4 mmHg lower in the morning and 5.8 mmHg lower in the evening. The rate of SBP control (135 mmHg) was better in the telemedicine group (85.3% vs 70.0%; P=.01), and significant adverse events were not observed.
We present evidence suggesting that antihypertensive therapy via home BP telemonitoring and web-based video visits achieve better BP control than conventional care and is a safe treatment alternative that warrants further investigation.
UMIN-CTR UMIN000025372; https://tinyurl.com/47ejkn4b.
时间负担往往是患者中断治疗的主要原因。远程医疗可通过提供便利来帮助患者坚持治疗。
本研究考察了远程医疗在日本用于管理高血压的疗效和安全性。
2015年11月至2017年2月期间,通过网络广告招募了无并发症高血压患者。然后对他们进行筛查,根据诊室收缩压(SBP)分层,并随机分为两组:常规护理(UC)组和远程医疗组。远程医疗组使用连接3G网络的家庭血压监测设备,通过基于网络的视频问诊向学术医院的高血压专家咨询,并通过邮件接收处方药,为期1年。UC组使用相同的血压监测设备,但通过自我记录的血压读数进行管理,包括日记记录以及在社区诊所测量的诊室血压。
99名患者完成了初始筛查,其中54%患有未经治疗的高血压。两组的基线血压相似,但在1年研究期结束时,远程医疗组的每周平均SBP显著更低(分别为125,标准差9 mmHg和131,标准差12 mmHg;P = 0.02)。远程医疗组早晨的SBP低3.4 mmHg,晚上低5.8 mmHg。远程医疗组的SBP控制率(<135 mmHg)更好(85.3%对70.0%;P = 0.01),且未观察到显著不良事件。
我们提供的证据表明,通过家庭血压远程监测和基于网络的视频问诊进行的抗高血压治疗比传统护理能实现更好的血压控制,是一种安全的治疗选择,值得进一步研究。
UMIN-CTR UMIN000025372;https://tinyurl.com/47ejkn4b 。