Pelicioni Paulo H S, Lord Stephen R, Sturnieks Daina L, Halmy Bethany, Menant Jasmine C
Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 12;8:554231. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.554231. eCollection 2021.
Choice stepping reaction time tasks are underpinned by neuropsychological, sensorimotor, and balance systems and therefore offer good indices of fall risk and physical and cognitive frailty. However, little is known of the neural mechanisms for impaired stepping and associated fall risk in older people. We investigated cognitive and motor cortical activity during cognitively demanding stepping reaction time tasks using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in older people at low and high fall risk. Ninety-five older adults [mean (SD) 71.4 (4.9) years, 23 men] were categorized as low or high fall risk [based on 12-month fall history (≥2 falls) and/or Physiological Profile Assessment fall risk score ≥1]. Participants performed a choice stepping reaction time test and a more cognitively demanding Stroop stepping task on a computerized step mat. Cortical activity in cognitive [dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)] and motor (supplementary motor area and premotor cortex) regions was recorded using fNIRS. Stepping performance and cortical activity were contrasted between the groups and between the choice and Stroop stepping conditions. Compared with the low fall risk group ( = 71), the high fall risk group ( = 24) exhibited significantly greater DLPFC activity and increased intra-individual variability in stepping response time during the Stroop stepping task. The high fall risk group DLPFC activity was greater during the performance of Stroop stepping task in comparison with choice stepping reaction time. Regardless of group, the Stroop stepping task elicited increased cortical activity in the supplementary motor area and premotor cortex together with increased mean and intra-individual variability of stepping response times. Older people at high fall risk exhibited increased DLPFC activity and stepping response time variability when completing a cognitively demanding stepping test compared with those at low fall risk and to a simpler choice-stepping reaction time test. This increased hemodynamic response might comprise a compensatory process for postural control deficits and/or reflect a degree of DLPFC neural inefficiency in people with increased fall risk.
选择步幅反应时间任务由神经心理学、感觉运动和平衡系统支撑,因此能很好地指示跌倒风险以及身体和认知功能的衰弱程度。然而,对于老年人步幅受损及相关跌倒风险的神经机制,我们知之甚少。我们使用功能近红外光谱技术(fNIRS),对跌倒风险低和高的老年人在认知要求较高的步幅反应时间任务中认知和运动皮层的活动进行了研究。95名老年人[平均(标准差)71.4(4.9)岁,23名男性]根据12个月的跌倒史(≥2次跌倒)和/或生理特征评估跌倒风险评分≥1被分类为低跌倒风险或高跌倒风险。参与者在计算机化的步垫上进行了选择步幅反应时间测试和认知要求更高的斯特鲁普步幅任务。使用fNIRS记录认知区域[背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)]和运动区域(辅助运动区和运动前皮层)的皮层活动。比较了两组之间以及选择步幅和斯特鲁普步幅条件下的步幅表现和皮层活动。与低跌倒风险组(n = 71)相比,高跌倒风险组(n = 24)在斯特鲁普步幅任务中表现出显著更高的DLPFC活动,且步幅反应时间的个体内变异性增加。与选择步幅反应时间相比,高跌倒风险组在执行斯特鲁普步幅任务时DLPFC活动更强。无论组别如何,斯特鲁普步幅任务都会引起辅助运动区和运动前皮层的皮层活动增加,同时步幅反应时间的平均值和个体内变异性也会增加。与低跌倒风险的老年人以及较简单的选择步幅反应时间测试相比,高跌倒风险的老年人在完成认知要求较高的步幅测试时,DLPFC活动增加,步幅反应时间变异性增大。这种增加的血流动力学反应可能是对姿势控制缺陷的一种代偿过程,和/或反映了跌倒风险增加人群中DLPFC神经效率的一定程度的低下。