Suppr超能文献

蜂巢几何形状决定了蜜蜂群体的招募率。

Hive geometry shapes the recruitment rate of honeybee colonies.

机构信息

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Math Biol. 2021 Jul 29;83(2):20. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01644-9.

Abstract

Honey bees make decisions regarding foraging and nest-site selection in groups ranging from hundreds to thousands of individuals. To effectively make these decisions, bees need to communicate within a spatially distributed group. However, the spatiotemporal dynamics of honey bee communication have been mostly overlooked in models of collective decisions, focusing primarily on mean field models of opinion dynamics. We analyze how the spatial properties of the nest or hive, and the movement of individuals with different belief states (uncommitted or committed) therein affect the rate of information transmission using spatially-extended models of collective decision-making within a hive. Honeybees waggle-dance to recruit conspecifics with an intensity that is a threshold nonlinear function of the waggler concentration. Our models range from treating the hive as a chain of discrete patches to a continuous line (long narrow hive). The combination of population-thresholded recruitment and compartmentalized populations generates tradeoffs between rapid information propagation with strong population dispersal and recruitment failures resulting from excessive population diffusion and also creates an effective colony-level signal-detection mechanism whereby recruitment to low quality objectives is blocked.

摘要

蜜蜂在从数百到数千只个体组成的群体中做出觅食和巢址选择的决策。为了有效地做出这些决策,蜜蜂需要在空间分布的群体中进行通信。然而,在群体决策的模型中,蜜蜂的通信时空动态大多被忽视,主要集中在意见动态的平均场模型上。我们分析了巢或蜂巢的空间特性,以及具有不同信念状态(未承诺或承诺)的个体在其中的运动如何影响信息传递的速度,方法是使用蜂巢内的集体决策的空间扩展模型。蜜蜂通过摆动舞来招募同种个体,其强度是摇摆者浓度的阈值非线性函数。我们的模型范围从将蜂巢视为离散斑块的链到连续线(狭长的蜂巢)。种群阈值招募和分隔种群的组合在快速信息传播与强烈的种群扩散之间产生了权衡,同时也产生了由于过度的种群扩散而导致的招募失败,并且还创建了一个有效的群体级信号检测机制,从而阻止了对低质量目标的招募。

相似文献

1
Hive geometry shapes the recruitment rate of honeybee colonies.
J Math Biol. 2021 Jul 29;83(2):20. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01644-9.
2
Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1567-83. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1066.
3
Mathematical analysis of the honeybee waggle dance.
Acta Biol Hung. 2012;63 Suppl 2:75-9. doi: 10.1556/ABiol.63.2012.Suppl.2.8.
4
Hydrocarbons emitted by waggle-dancing honey bees increase forager recruitment by stimulating dancing.
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 20;9(8):e105671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105671. eCollection 2014.
5
Honey loading for pollen collection: regulation of crop content in honeybee pollen foragers on leaving hive.
Naturwissenschaften. 2014 Jul;101(7):595-8. doi: 10.1007/s00114-014-1185-z. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
6
Does the Earth's magnetic field serve as a reference for alignment of the honeybee Waggle dance?
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115665. eCollection 2014.
7
Honey bee colonies change their foraging decisions after in-hive experiences with unsuitable pollen.
J Exp Biol. 2024 Jan 1;227(1). doi: 10.1242/jeb.246233. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
8
The honeybee waggle dance: can we follow the steps?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 May;24(5):242-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.007. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
9
The tremble dance of honey bees can be caused by hive-external foraging experience.
J Exp Biol. 2003 Jul;206(Pt 13):2111-6. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00398.
10
A Method for Studying Social Signal Learning of the Waggle Dance in Honey Bees.
Bio Protoc. 2023 Aug 20;13(16):e4789. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4789.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Social inhibition maintains adaptivity and consensus of honeybees foraging in dynamic environments.
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Dec 11;6(12):191681. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191681. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
The Cognitive Ecology of Stimulus Ambiguity: A Predator-Prey Perspective.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Nov;34(11):1048-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
3
Optimal network topology for responsive collective behavior.
Sci Adv. 2019 Apr 3;5(4):eaau0999. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau0999. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
Honeybees forage more successfully without the "dance language" in challenging environments.
Sci Adv. 2019 Feb 13;5(2):eaat0450. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat0450. eCollection 2019 Feb.
5
Regulation of harvester ant foraging as a closed-loop excitable system.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Dec 4;14(12):e1006200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006200. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
The Psychology of Superorganisms: Collective Decision Making by Insect Societies.
Annu Rev Entomol. 2018 Jan 7;63:259-275. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043249. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
7
Effect of Interactions between Harvester Ants on Forager Decisions.
Front Ecol Evol. 2016 Oct;4. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00115. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
8
Model of the best-of-N nest-site selection process in honeybees.
Phys Rev E. 2017 May;95(5-1):052411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.052411. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
Interactions Increase Forager Availability and Activity in Harvester Ants.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0141971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141971. eCollection 2015.
10
Nest architecture shapes the collective behaviour of harvester ants.
Biol Lett. 2015 Oct;11(10). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0695.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验