Suppr超能文献

伴有和不伴有糖尿病的心房颤动患者的结局:COOL-AF 注册研究的倾向评分匹配。

Outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation with and without diabetes: A propensity score matching of the COOL-AF registry.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Cardiology, Surat Thani Hospital, Surat Thani, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14671. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14671. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) compared between those with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective multicenter nationwide registry for patients with NVAF from 27 hospitals in Thailand. Patients were followed-up every 6 months until 3 years. The outcome measurements were ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, and heart failure (HF). All reported events were confirmed by the adjudication committee. DM was diagnosed by history or laboratory data.

RESULTS

We studied 3402 patients. DM was diagnosed in 923 patients (27.1%). The average follow-up duration was 25.74 ± 10.57 months (7912 persons-year). The rate of IS/TIA, major bleeding, and HF was 1.42, 2.11, and 3.03 per 100 person-years. Patients with DM had a significantly increased risk of IS/TIA, major bleeding, and HF. After adjusting for age, gender, comorbid conditions, and the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) using propensity score matching, DM remained a significant predictor of ischemic stroke/TIA, major bleeding and HF with Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of 1.67 (1.02, 2.73), 1.65 (1.13, 2.40), and 1.87 (1.34, 2.59), respectively. The net clinical benefit of OAC was more pronounced in DM patients (0.88 events per 100 person-years) than in those without DM (-0.73 events per 100 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS

DM increases the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in NVAF patients. The benefit of OAC outweighs the risk in DM patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在对比糖尿病(DM)与非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者的临床结局。

方法

我们对泰国 27 家医院的 NVAF 患者进行了前瞻性多中心全国性注册登记研究。患者每 6 个月随访一次,随访时间为 3 年。研究终点包括缺血性卒中(IS)或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、大出血和心力衰竭(HF)。所有报告的事件均由裁决委员会确认。DM 通过病史或实验室数据确诊。

结果

共纳入 3402 例患者,其中 923 例(27.1%)患者被诊断为 DM。平均随访时间为 25.74±10.57 个月(7912 人年)。IS/TIA、大出血和 HF 的发生率分别为 1.42、2.11 和 3.03/100 人年。DM 患者发生 IS/TIA、大出血和 HF 的风险显著增加。经倾向评分匹配调整年龄、性别、合并症和口服抗凝剂(OAC)使用情况后,DM 仍然是 IS/TIA、大出血和 HF 的显著预测因素,其风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)分别为 1.67(1.02,2.73)、1.65(1.13,2.40)和 1.87(1.34,2.59)。与无 DM 患者(-0.73 例/100 人年)相比,DM 患者使用 OAC 的净临床获益更为显著(0.88 例/100 人年)。

结论

DM 增加了 NVAF 患者不良临床结局的风险。DM 患者使用 OAC 的获益大于风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验