Harwayne-Gidansky Ilana, Zurca Adrian, Maa Tensing, Bhalala Utpal S, Malaiyandi Deepa, Nawathe Pooja, Sarwal Aarti, Waseem Muhammad, Kenes Michael, Vennero Megan, Emlet Lillian
Pediatrics, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, USA.
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Jun 22;13(6):e15844. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15844. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Background Simulation is used in critical care for skill development, formative assessment, and interprofessional team performance. Healthcare educators need to balance the relatively high cost to deliver simulation education with the potential impact on healthcare quality. It is unclear how to prioritize simulation in critical care education, especially considering interprofessional needs across adult and pediatric populations. The objective of this study was to prioritize topics for critical care educators developing simulation-based educational interventions. Methodology A modified Delphi process was used to identify and prioritize critical care topics taught using simulation. We disseminated a multi-institutional survey to understand critical care simulation topics using a three-round modified Delphi technique. An expert panel was recruited based on their expertise with simulation-based education through the Society for Simulation in Healthcare and the Society of Critical Care Medicine lists. Critical care topics originated using content derived from multiple critical care board examination contents. Additional content for a critical care simulation-based curriculum was generated. Results Consensus and prioritization were achieved in three rounds, with 52 simulation experts participating. The first Delphi round surveyed priority topics in critical care content and generated additional topics for inclusion in round two. The second Delphi round added the content with the highest-ranked items from round one to generate a set of simulation-based topic priorities. The third Delphi round asked participants to determine the importance of each priority item taught via simulation compared to other modalities for clinical education. This round yielded 106 topics over four domains categorized into (1) Diagnosis and Management of Clinical Problems, (2) Procedural Skills, (3) Teamwork and Communication Skills, and (4) General Knowledge and Knowledge of Technical Adjuncts. Conclusions The modified Delphi survey revealed a prioritized, consensus-based list of topics and domains for critical care educators to focus on when creating a simulation-based critical care curriculum. Future work will focus on developing specific simulation-based critical care curricula.
背景
模拟技术在重症监护中用于技能培养、形成性评估和跨专业团队协作。医疗保健教育工作者需要在提供模拟教育的相对高成本与对医疗质量的潜在影响之间取得平衡。目前尚不清楚如何在重症监护教育中对模拟技术进行优先级排序,尤其是考虑到成人和儿科人群的跨专业需求。本研究的目的是为开发基于模拟的教育干预措施的重症监护教育工作者确定主题的优先级。
方法
采用改良的德尔菲法来识别和确定使用模拟教学的重症监护主题的优先级。我们通过三轮改良德尔菲技术进行了一项多机构调查,以了解重症监护模拟主题。基于他们在医疗保健模拟协会和危重病医学会名单中基于模拟教育的专业知识招募了一个专家小组。重症监护主题源自多个重症监护委员会考试内容的衍生内容。生成了基于重症监护模拟课程的其他内容。
结果
经过三轮达成了共识并确定了优先级,有52名模拟专家参与。第一轮德尔菲调查了重症监护内容中的优先主题,并生成了其他主题以纳入第二轮。第二轮德尔菲将第一轮中排名最高的项目内容添加进来,以生成一组基于模拟的主题优先级。第三轮德尔菲要求参与者确定通过模拟教授的每个优先项目相对于临床教育的其他方式的重要性。这一轮产生了106个主题,分为四个领域:(1)临床问题的诊断和管理,(2)操作技能,(3)团队合作和沟通技能,以及(4)一般知识和技术辅助知识。
结论
改良的德尔菲调查揭示了一份基于共识的优先主题和领域清单,供重症监护教育工作者在创建基于模拟的重症监护课程时重点关注。未来的工作将集中在开发特定的基于模拟的重症监护课程上。