School of Industrial Engineering (ETSII), C/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, Grupo de Agroenergética, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain.
School of Industrial Engineering (ETSII), C/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, Grupo de Agroenergética, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 1;798:149203. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149203. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
The aim of this investigation is to quantify the environmental footprint of an industrially produced bean and pork stew produced using a combination of local/imported and fresh/ processed ingredients. The study describes 16 midpoint categories and an aggregated score, calculated following the EC Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology. The carbon footprint of 1 kg of stew amounts to 2.23 kg CO eq., with the production of ingredients (upstream phase) dominating most impact categories (e.g., 68.0% of carbon footprint and 73.5% of the single score), due primarily to the emission intensity of animal products. Although the white beans account for 43.7 wt%, its carbon emissions represent only 18.4% of those generated by the ingredients. However, white beans have a high contribution on other impact categories such as toxicity, acidification, and eutrophication, which are associated with the use of agrochemicals. Despite being imported from Argentina to Spain, transport has a limited contribution to most impact categories (e.g., 18.1% climate change and 12.9% the single score). Despite showing a very high carbon intensity, the contribution of spices to the environmental footprint of the stew is very limited due to the very small amounts consumed. The industrial cooking stage (core phase) contributes to 17.3% of the stew's carbon footprint and 10.6% of the aggregated score, due to emissions derived primarily from the use of natural gas and electricity. Distribution is the activity contributing the most to the consumption stage. The tinplate employed to fabricate the metal cans is responsible for most of the impact associated with the packaging of the stew. However, substituting tinplate with aluminium is not recommended due primarily to the lower environmental savings associated with the recycling of the latter.
本研究旨在量化一份采用本地/进口原料和新鲜/加工配料制作的工业生产的豆猪肉炖菜的环境足迹。该研究描述了 16 个中点类别和一个综合得分,根据欧盟产品环境足迹 (PEF) 方法进行计算。1 公斤炖菜的碳足迹为 2.23 千克 CO eq,其中配料生产(上游阶段)主导着大多数影响类别(例如,碳足迹的 68.0%和单一得分的 73.5%),主要是由于动物产品的排放强度。尽管白豆占 43.7wt%,但其碳排放仅占配料产生的碳排放的 18.4%。然而,白豆对其他影响类别(如毒性、酸化和富营养化)有很高的贡献,这与农用化学品的使用有关。尽管从阿根廷进口到西班牙,但运输对大多数影响类别(如气候变化的 18.1%和单一得分的 12.9%)的贡献有限。尽管显示出很高的碳强度,但由于消耗的数量非常少,香料对炖菜的环境足迹的贡献非常有限。工业烹饪阶段(核心阶段)对炖菜的碳足迹贡献 17.3%,对综合得分的贡献 10.6%,这主要是由于天然气和电力使用产生的排放。分配是对消费阶段贡献最大的活动。用于制造金属罐的马口铁对炖菜包装相关的大部分影响负责。然而,不建议用铝代替马口铁,主要是因为后者的回收利用带来的环境效益较低。