• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝性脑病病史不是难治性腹水行经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的禁忌证。

History of Hepatic Encephalopathy Is Not a Contraindication to Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement for Refractory Ascites.

机构信息

Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 1;12(8):e00378. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000378.

DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000378
PMID:34333500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8323801/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are controversial. We studied the relationship of pre-TIPS HE in patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites on all-cause mortality and development of post-TIPS HE.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective comparison study was performed for patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites. Survival by history of pre-TIPS HE was demonstrated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of post-TIPS clinical outcomes for patients with and without pre-TIPS HE.

RESULTS

We identified 202 TIPS recipients (61% male, mean ± SD; age 59.1 ± 10.2 years; mean model for end-stage liver disease score 17.3 ± 6.9). Pre-TIPS HE did not predispose patients for increased all-cause mortality, increased risk of experiencing HE within 60 days, or increased risk of hospital admission for HE within 6 months. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that total bilirubin (odds ratio [OR] 1.03; P = 0.016) and blood urea nitrogen (OR 1.15; P = 0.002) were predictors for all-cause mortality within 6 months post-TIPS. Age ≥65 years (OR 3.92; P = 0.004), creatinine (OR 2.22; P = 0.014), and Child-Pugh score (OR 1.53; P = 0.006) were predictors for HE within 60 days post-TIPS. Predictors of intensive care admission for HE within 6 months post-TIPS included age ≥65 years (OR 8.84; P = 0.018), history of any admission for HE within 6 months pre-TIPS (OR 8.42; P = 0.017), and creatinine (OR 2.22; P = 0.015).

DISCUSSION

If controlled, pre-TIPS HE does not adversely impact patient survival or clinical outcomes, such as development of HE within 60 days of TIPS or hospital admission for HE within 6 months. Patients may be able to undergo TIPS for refractory ascites despite a history of HE.

摘要

介绍

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗肝性脑病(HE)患者的结局存在争议。我们研究了 TIPS 治疗难治性腹水患者的术前 HE 与全因死亡率和 TIPS 后 HE 发展的关系。

方法

对 TIPS 治疗难治性腹水的患者进行了单中心回顾性比较研究。通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线展示了术前 HE 病史对生存率的影响。对有和无术前 HE 的患者进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定 TIPS 后临床结局的预测因素。

结果

我们共纳入 202 例接受 TIPS 治疗的患者(61%为男性,平均年龄±标准差为 59.1±10.2 岁;平均终末期肝病模型评分 17.3±6.9)。术前 HE 并不会增加全因死亡率、TIPS 后 60 天内发生 HE 的风险或 TIPS 后 6 个月内因 HE 住院的风险。多变量分析表明,总胆红素(比值比 [OR] 1.03;P=0.016)和血尿素氮(OR 1.15;P=0.002)是 TIPS 后 6 个月内全因死亡的预测因素。年龄≥65 岁(OR 3.92;P=0.004)、肌酐(OR 2.22;P=0.014)和 Child-Pugh 评分(OR 1.53;P=0.006)是 TIPS 后 60 天内发生 HE 的预测因素。TIPS 后 6 个月内因 HE 入住重症监护病房的预测因素包括年龄≥65 岁(OR 8.84;P=0.018)、TIPS 前 6 个月内因 HE 住院的任何病史(OR 8.42;P=0.017)和肌酐(OR 2.22;P=0.015)。

讨论

如果得到控制,术前 HE 并不会对患者的生存或临床结局产生不利影响,如 TIPS 后 60 天内发生 HE 或 TIPS 后 6 个月内因 HE 住院。尽管有 HE 病史,患者仍可能接受 TIPS 治疗难治性腹水。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f27/8323801/e9e3bdb42602/ct9-12-e00378-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f27/8323801/6354a142b61c/ct9-12-e00378-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f27/8323801/e9e3bdb42602/ct9-12-e00378-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f27/8323801/6354a142b61c/ct9-12-e00378-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f27/8323801/e9e3bdb42602/ct9-12-e00378-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
History of Hepatic Encephalopathy Is Not a Contraindication to Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement for Refractory Ascites.肝性脑病病史不是难治性腹水行经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的禁忌证。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 1;12(8):e00378. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000378.
2
Morbidity and mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement in patients with cirrhosis.肝硬化患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术置入后的发病率和死亡率。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;31(5):626-632. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001342.
3
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗顽固性腹水:个体患者数据的荟萃分析
Gastroenterology. 2007 Sep;133(3):825-34. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.020. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
4
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement for refractory ascites: a single-centre experience.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗顽固性腹水:单中心经验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;47(12):1494-500. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.703239. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
5
Differences in long-term survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites and variceal bleed.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗顽固性腹水和静脉曲张出血后的长期生存率差异。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Mar;20(3):474-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03601.x.
6
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients for management of refractory ascites: clinical outcome.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝移植受者难治性腹水:临床转归。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.025.
7
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and alfapump® system for refractory ascites in liver cirrhosis: Outcomes and complications.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术和 Alfapump®系统治疗肝硬化难治性腹水:结局和并发症。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Oct;8(8):961-969. doi: 10.1177/2050640620938525. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
Pre-existing Hepatic Encephalopathy: Really a Contraindication to Elective TIPS?既往存在的肝性脑病:真的是选择性经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的禁忌证吗?
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jan;47(1):69-77. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03566-z. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
9
Long-term effects and complications of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a single-centre experience.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的长期影响及并发症:单中心经验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;54(7):899-904. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1630675. Epub 2019 Jun 16.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with viral hepatitis related liver cirrhosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt treatment.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗后病毒性肝炎相关肝硬化患者的长期临床结局。
Virol J. 2018 Oct 1;15(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1067-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Trends and Hospital Mortality of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in Germany: A Descriptive Analysis Between 2019 and 2023.德国经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的临床趋势与医院死亡率:2019年至2023年的描述性分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;15(15):1902. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151902.
2
Hepatic encephalopathy post-TIPS: Current status and prospects in predictive assessment.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后肝性脑病:预测评估的现状与前景
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Jul 10;24:493-506. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.07.008. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Post-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Hepatic Encephalopathy-A Review of the Past Decade's Literature Focusing on Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis.
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)相关性肝性脑病——基于发病率、危险因素及预防的过去十年文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 19;13(1):14. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010014.
4
Invited Commentary: Pre-existing Hepatic Encephalopathy: Really a Contraindication to Elective TIPS? by Torkian etal.特邀评论:既往存在肝性脑病:真的是选择性经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的禁忌证吗?作者:托尔基安等人
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jan;47(1):78-79. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03627-3. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
5
Pre-existing Hepatic Encephalopathy: Really a Contraindication to Elective TIPS?既往存在的肝性脑病:真的是选择性经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的禁忌证吗?
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jan;47(1):69-77. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03566-z. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Changing Epidemiology of Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy.肝硬化和肝性脑病不断变化的流行病学
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;20(8S):S1-S8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.036.