Department of Environmental Studies, Centre for Environmental Management of Degraded Ecosystems (CEMDE), University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Division of Biological Sciences and the Institute on Ecosystems, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
Phys Life Rev. 2021 Sep;38:1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
Vegetation patterning in water-limited and other resource-limited ecosystems highlights spatial self-organization processes as potentially key drivers of community assembly. These processes provide insight into predictable landscape-level relationships between organisms and their abiotic environment in the form of regular and irregular patterns of biota and resources. However, two aspects have largely been overlooked; the roles played by plant - soil-biota feedbacks and allelopathy in spatial self-organization, and their potential contribution, along with plant-resource feedbacks, to community assembly through spatial self-organization. Here, we expand the drivers of spatial self-organization from a focus on plant-resource feedbacks to include plant - soil-biota feedbacks and allelopathy, and integrate concepts of nonlinear physics and community ecology to generate a new hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, below-ground processes can affect community assemblages through two types of spatial self-organization, global and local. The former occurs simultaneously across whole ecosystems, leading to self-organized patterns of biota, allelochemicals and resources, and niche partitioning. The latter occurs locally in ecotones, and determines ecotone structure and motion, invasion dynamics, and species coexistence. Studies of the two forms of spatial self-organization are important for understanding the organization of plant communities in drier climates which are likely to involve spatial patterning or re-patterning. Such studies are also important for developing new practices of ecosystem management, based on local manipulations at ecotones, to slow invasion dynamics or induce transitions from transitive to intransitive networks of interspecific interactions which increase species diversity.
在水资源受限和其他资源受限的生态系统中,植被模式突出了空间自组织过程作为群落组装的潜在关键驱动因素。这些过程以生物区系和资源的规则和不规则模式的形式,提供了关于生物与非生物环境之间可预测的景观水平关系的深入了解。然而,有两个方面在很大程度上被忽视了;植物-土壤-生物群反馈和化感作用在空间自组织中的作用,以及它们与植物-资源反馈一起,通过空间自组织对群落组装的潜在贡献。在这里,我们将空间自组织的驱动因素从关注植物-资源反馈扩展到包括植物-土壤-生物群反馈和化感作用,并整合非线性物理学和群落生态学的概念,提出一个新的假设。根据这一假设,地下过程可以通过两种类型的空间自组织——全局和局部——来影响群落组合。前者同时发生在整个生态系统中,导致生物区系、化感物质和资源的自组织模式以及生态位分离。后者在生态交错带局部发生,并决定生态交错带的结构和运动、入侵动态以及物种共存。对这两种形式的空间自组织的研究对于理解在更干燥气候下植物群落的组织是重要的,这种组织可能涉及空间模式或重新模式化。这些研究对于发展基于生态交错带局部操纵的生态系统管理新实践也很重要,以减缓入侵动态或诱导从过渡到种间相互作用的不可传递网络的转变,从而增加物种多样性。