• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 个东非社区医疗营中农村卫生人口统计学的比较分析:志愿者的观点。

Comparative Analysis of Rural Health Demographics in 2 East African Communities During Medical Camps: Volunteers' Perspectives'.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.

Ministry of Health and Population, Lilongwe, Malawi.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211035095. doi: 10.1177/21501327211035095.

DOI:10.1177/21501327211035095
PMID:34338078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8326616/
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To compare of basic health and social demographics observed during 4-day medical camps in 2 rural communities in Zambia and Malawi to determine any significant differences or similarities.

METHOD

About 12 and 10 local and international volunteers at medical camps (at a temporary rural health post or community hall) in rural Zambia and Malawi respectively treated 488 patients in total, with basic health and social demographic data collected and results analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients seen in Malawi and Zambia were 34.5 and 38.9 years respectively, with 39% and 40% of patients in Malawi and Zambia respectively being within the 18 to 44 years age group, and mostly females (59.7% in Malawi and 65.7% in Zambia). Most were non-infectious diseases (97.3% in Zambia, 95% in Malawi), mostly musculoskeletal (17.0% in Malawi and 30.5% in Zambia), while medications prescribed were mostly analgesics (35.7% in Malawi and 29.9% in Zambia). Only a small proportion of patients were referred to local secondary facilities or district hospitals, 51 (28.7%) in Malawi and 59 (19.9%) in Zambia respectively. Chi square test shows a significant difference ( < .001) in diseases in both countries, but there was no statistically significant difference between the mean age of patients seen in both countries, using the independent -test ( = .365).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights statistically significant demographic differences between the 2 communities and possible reasons for these, and how volunteers' roles in rural healthcare in the East African communities could be further evaluated.

摘要

目的和目标

比较在赞比亚和马拉维的两个农村社区进行的为期 4 天的医疗营中观察到的基本健康和社会人口统计学数据,以确定任何显著的差异或相似之处。

方法

在赞比亚和马拉维的农村地区,分别有 12 名和 10 名当地和国际志愿者在医疗营(临时农村卫生所或社区大厅)工作,总共治疗了 488 名患者,收集了基本健康和社会人口统计学数据,并进行了分析。

结果

在马拉维和赞比亚就诊的患者的平均年龄分别为 34.5 岁和 38.9 岁,分别有 39%和 40%的患者在 18 至 44 岁年龄组,且大多数为女性(马拉维为 59.7%,赞比亚为 65.7%)。大多数为非传染性疾病(赞比亚为 97.3%,马拉维为 95%),主要为肌肉骨骼疾病(马拉维为 17.0%,赞比亚为 30.5%),而开的药物主要为镇痛药(马拉维为 35.7%,赞比亚为 29.9%)。只有一小部分患者被转介到当地二级医疗机构或地区医院,马拉维为 51 人(28.7%),赞比亚为 59 人(19.9%)。卡方检验显示两国的疾病存在显著差异( < .001),但两国患者的平均年龄使用独立样本 t 检验无统计学差异( = .365)。

结论

本研究突出了这两个社区之间在人口统计学方面存在显著差异,并探讨了这些差异的可能原因,以及如何进一步评估东非社区中志愿者在农村医疗保健中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/8326616/781147c5143e/10.1177_21501327211035095-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/8326616/781147c5143e/10.1177_21501327211035095-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5af/8326616/781147c5143e/10.1177_21501327211035095-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Rural Health Demographics in 2 East African Communities During Medical Camps: Volunteers' Perspectives'.2 个东非社区医疗营中农村卫生人口统计学的比较分析:志愿者的观点。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211035095. doi: 10.1177/21501327211035095.
2
Who accesses surgery at district level in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Malawi and Zambia.在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,谁能在地区层面接受手术治疗?来自马拉维和赞比亚的证据。
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Dec;22(12):1533-1541. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12989. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
3
Anesthesia Capacity of District-Level Hospitals in Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia: A Mixed-Methods Study.马拉维、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚地区级医院的麻醉能力:一项混合方法研究。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Apr;130(4):845-853. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004363.
4
Health workforce responses to global health initiatives funding: a comparison of Malawi and Zambia.卫生人力对全球卫生倡议资金的反应:马拉维和赞比亚的比较。
Hum Resour Health. 2010 Aug 11;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-8-19.
5
Maternal mortality in rural Zambia.赞比亚农村地区的孕产妇死亡率。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 Aug;76(7):646-50. doi: 10.3109/00016349709024604.
6
Integration of community home based care programmes within national primary health care revitalisation strategies in Ethiopia, Malawi, South-Africa and Zambia: a comparative assessment.埃塞俄比亚、马拉维、南非和赞比亚将社区居家护理项目纳入国家初级卫生保健振兴战略的比较评估
Global Health. 2014 Dec 11;10:85. doi: 10.1186/s12992-014-0085-5.
7
Surgical ambulance referrals in sub-Saharan Africa - financial costs and coping strategies at district hospitals in Tanzania, Malawi and Zambia.撒哈拉以南非洲的外科救护车转诊——坦桑尼亚、马拉维和赞比亚地区医院的财务成本和应对策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06709-5.
8
Reorienting Primary Health Care Services for Non-Communicable Diseases: A Comparative Preparedness Assessment of Two Healthcare Networks in Malawi and Zambia.重新定位非传染性疾病的初级卫生保健服务:马拉维和赞比亚两个医疗保健网络的比较准备情况评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 10;18(9):5044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18095044.
9
The role of "Theatre for Development" in mobilising rural communities for primary health care: the case of Liwonde PHC Unit in southern Malawi.“发展戏剧”在动员农村社区参与初级卫生保健方面的作用:以马拉维南部利翁德初级卫生保健机构为例
J Soc Dev Afr. 1996;11(1):53-78.
10
Oral rehydration solution coverage in under 5 children with diarrhea: a tri-country, subnational, cross-sectional comparative analysis of two demographic health surveys cycles.口服补液盐在腹泻 5 岁以下儿童中的覆盖情况:两项人口健康调查周期的三国次国家、横断面比较分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1716. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09811-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging Mothers on the Growth of School-Age Children in a Rural South African Health and Demographic Site: A Qualitative Insight.在南非农村一个健康与人口监测点促进母亲关注学龄儿童成长:质性洞察
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 18;9(2):225. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020225.
2
Rural-urban health-seeking behaviours for non-communicable diseases in Sierra Leone.塞拉利昂农村-城市地区非传染性疾病的卫生服务利用行为。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Mar 2;5(2):e002024. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002024. eCollection 2020.
3
Contrasting HIV prevalence trends among young women and men in Zambia in the past 12 years: data from demographic and health surveys 2002-2014.
过去 12 年赞比亚青年男女艾滋病毒感染率趋势对比:来自 2002-2014 年人口与健康调查的数据。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 May 17;19(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4059-3.
4
Determinants of access to improved sanitation facilities in rural districts of southern Ghana: evidence from Dodowa Health and Demographic Surveillance Site.加纳南部农村地区获得改善卫生设施的决定因素:来自多德瓦健康与人口监测点的证据
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jul 13;11(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3572-6.
5
Is the Urban Child Health Advantage Declining in Malawi?: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. Malawi 城市儿童健康优势是否在下降?:来自人口与健康调查和多指标类集调查的证据。
J Urban Health. 2019 Feb;96(1):131-143. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0270-6.
6
Community Health Workers and the Management of Noncommunicable Diseases Among Rural Health Clinics in Limpopo Province, South Africa: A Pilot Study.南非林波波省农村卫生诊所的社区卫生工作者与非传染性疾病管理:一项试点研究。
Fam Community Health. 2017 Oct/Dec;40(4):338-346. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000158.
7
Clinical management of children with fever: a cross-sectional study of quality of care in rural Zambia.发热儿童的临床管理:赞比亚农村地区医疗质量的横断面研究
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 May 1;95(5):333-342. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.170092. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
Rural-Urban Differences in Access to Preventive Health Care Among Publicly Insured Minnesotans.明尼苏达州参保人群获得预防保健服务的城乡差异。
J Rural Health. 2018 Feb;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s48-s55. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12235. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
An assessment of the effect of user fee policy reform on facility-based deliveries in rural Zambia.赞比亚农村地区用户收费政策改革对机构分娩影响的评估。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Dec 7;9(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2316-8.
10
The economic burden of chronic non-communicable diseases in rural Malawi: an observational study.马拉维农村慢性非传染性疾病的经济负担:一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1716-8.