Suppr超能文献

髌股关节不稳定的治疗:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

Management of Patellar Instability: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

机构信息

NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(9):2561-2567. doi: 10.1177/03635465211020000. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple surgical options exist for the treatment of patellar instability; however, the most common procedures involve either a reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) or a repair/plication of the MPFL and medial soft tissues.

PURPOSE

To perform a network meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the literature to compare MPFL reconstruction, MPFL repair, and nonoperative management for patellar instability.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

The literature search was performed based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RCTs comparing MPFL reconstruction, MPFL repair, and nonoperative management for patellar instability were included. Clinical outcomes included recurrent instability (including both dislocations and subluxations), redislocation, and Kujala score. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis, with statistical analysis performed using the statistical software R. The treatment options were ranked using scores.

RESULTS

There were 13 RCTs with a total of 789 patients, all with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. There were 150 patients treated using MPFL reconstruction, 353 treated using MPFL repair, and 286 treated nonoperatively. Overall, MPFL reconstruction had the highest score (0.9967) and resulted in a significantly lower recurrence rate than did MPFL repair (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.07-0.72) and nonoperative management (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03-0.32). In addition, MPFL repair resulted in a significantly lower recurrence rate than did nonoperative management (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.70). MPFL reconstruction had the highest score (0.9651) and resulted in a significantly higher Kujala score than did nonoperative management (mean difference, 10.45; 95% CI, 0.41-20.49) but not MPFL repair (mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.68). Subgroup analysis revealed that MPFL reconstruction had the highest score for all outcomes in those with first-time dislocation.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that MPFL reconstruction results in the lowest rate of recurrent patellar instability and best functional outcomes as measured using the Kujala score.

摘要

背景

治疗髌骨不稳定有多种手术选择;然而,最常见的手术包括内侧髌股韧带(MPFL)重建或 MPFL 和内侧软组织的修复/紧缩。

目的

对文献中的随机对照试验(RCT)进行网络荟萃分析,以比较 MPFL 重建、MPFL 修复和非手术治疗髌骨不稳定。

研究设计

系统评价和网络荟萃分析;证据水平,1 级。

方法

根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行文献检索。纳入比较 MPFL 重建、MPFL 修复和非手术治疗髌骨不稳定的 RCT。临床结果包括复发性不稳定(包括脱位和半脱位)、再脱位和 Kujala 评分。使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析的频率方法比较临床结果,使用 R 统计软件进行统计分析。使用 评分对治疗选择进行排名。

结果

共有 13 项 RCT,总计 789 例患者,所有患者的随访时间均至少为 24 个月。150 例患者接受 MPFL 重建治疗,353 例患者接受 MPFL 修复治疗,286 例患者接受非手术治疗。总体而言,MPFL 重建的 评分最高(0.9967),复发率明显低于 MPFL 修复(比值比 [OR],0.42;95%CI,0.07-0.72)和非手术治疗(OR,0.09;95%CI,0.03-0.32)。此外,MPFL 修复的复发率明显低于非手术治疗(OR,0.42;95%CI,0.25-0.70)。MPFL 重建的 评分最高(0.9651),Kujala 评分明显高于非手术治疗(平均差异,10.45;95%CI,0.41-20.49),但低于 MPFL 修复(平均差异,0.15;95%CI,0.03-0.68)。亚组分析显示,MPFL 重建在初次脱位患者的所有结果中均具有最高的 评分。

结论

本研究表明,MPFL 重建可降低复发性髌骨不稳定的发生率,并获得最佳的 Kujala 评分功能结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验