Suppr超能文献

蜂鸟会改变路线以避开较差的位置。

Hummingbirds modify their routes to avoid a poor location.

机构信息

School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Learn Behav. 2022 Mar;50(1):89-98. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00476-3. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

Abstract

Traplining, when animals repeat the order in which they visit a number of locations, is taxonomically widespread, but little is known about which factors influence the routes that animals follow. For example, as the quality of rewarding locations changes over time, foragers are expected to update their traplines, either to prioritize locations where the reward increases or to avoid locations that have ceased to be profitable. Here, we tested how traplining wild hummingbirds responded to increases or to decreases in the sucrose concentration of one of the flowers on their trapline. Hummingbirds did not change their trapline to visit the flower with the increased reward first, but by changing the order in which they visited flowers, they avoided a flower that contained a decreased reward. Depending on where along the trapline the reduced-content flower occurred, hummingbirds either changed the origin of their trapline or changed the direction in which they flew around their trapline. It may be that this asymmetric modification of foraging traplines is especially noticeable in risk-averse foragers, such as these territorial hummingbirds.

摘要

动物在重复访问一系列地点的顺序时会形成“陷阱线”,这种现象在分类学上广泛存在,但人们对影响动物所走路线的因素知之甚少。例如,随着奖励地点的质量随着时间的推移而变化,觅食者应该更新他们的“陷阱线”,要么优先考虑奖励增加的地点,要么避免那些不再盈利的地点。在这里,我们测试了野生蜂鸟如何响应“陷阱线”上某朵花的蔗糖浓度增加或减少。蜂鸟并没有改变它们的“陷阱线”,而是首先访问奖励增加的花朵,而是通过改变它们访问花朵的顺序,避免了含有减少奖励的花朵。根据减少含量的花朵出现在“陷阱线”上的位置,蜂鸟要么改变“陷阱线”的起点,要么改变它们在“陷阱线”周围飞行的方向。对于像这些有领地意识的蜂鸟这样的避险觅食者来说,这种对觅食“陷阱线”的不对称修改可能尤其明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d3a/8979907/f568d817c3d1/13420_2021_476_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验