Department of Health Sciences and Human Performance, The University of Tampa, Tampa, Florida.
Department of Health Sciences, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, New York.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Aug 1;36(8):2162-2168. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003953. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
Pearson, J, Wadhi, T, Barakat, C, Aube, D, Schoenfeld, BJ, Andersen, JC, Barroso, R, Ugrinowitsch, C, and De Souza, EO. Does varying repetition tempo in a single-joint lower body exercise augment muscle size and strength in resistance-trained men? J Strength Cond Res 36(8): 2162-2168, 2022-This study compared the effects of FAST and SLOW eccentric repetition tempo in a single exercise volume-matched intervention on muscle thickness (MT) and strength in resistance-trained men. Using a within-subject design, 13 subjects had each leg randomly assigned to SLOW (1-0-3) or FAST (1-0-1) repetition tempo. Subjects underwent an 8-week strength-training (ST) intervention performed twice weekly. Unilateral leg-extension one repetition-maximum (1RM) and anterior thigh MT at the proximal (MTP) and distal (MTD) portions were assessed via ultrasound imaging at baseline and after 8 weeks of RT. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) assessments of the training sessions (i.e., 16 per leg) were averaged for further analysis. Both legs similarly increased MTP (estimated differences: FAST: 0.24 cm, 3.6%; SLOW: 0.20 cm, 3.1%). However, for MTD, analysis of covariance analysis showed a leg effect ( p = 0.02) in which absolute pre-to-post change was greater in FAST compared with SLOW (estimated differences: FAST 0.23 cm, 5.5%; SLOW: 0.13 cm, 2.2%). For 1RM, both legs similarly increased maximum strength (estimated differences: FAST: 9.1 kg, 17.0%; SLOW: 10.4 kg, 22.1%, p ≤ 0.0001). The SLOW group had a higher RPE than FAST (8.59 vs. 7.98, p = 0.002). Despite differences in RPE, our results indicate that both repetition tempos produced similar muscular adaptations. However, they also suggest that the FAST tempo may provide a small hypertrophic advantage at the distal quadriceps. From a practical standpoint, strength and conditioning professionals may implement a FAST tempo at least in one single-joint exercise during an 8-week training period to enhance regional hypertrophic adaptations in trained individuals.
皮尔逊、J、瓦迪、T、巴罗索、R、乌格里诺维奇、C 和德索萨、EO。在单关节下肢运动中改变重复节奏是否会增加经过抗阻训练的男性的肌肉大小和力量?J 力量与调节研究 36(8):2162-2168,2022-本研究比较了 FAST 和 SLOW 离心重复节奏在运动容量匹配干预中的单一运动中的作用,以测量经过抗阻训练的男性的肌肉厚度 (MT) 和力量。使用自身对照设计,将 13 名受试者的每条腿随机分配到 SLOW(1-0-3)或 FAST(1-0-1)重复节奏。受试者接受每周两次的 8 周力量训练 (ST) 干预。使用超声成像在基线和 8 周 RT 后评估单侧腿伸肌 1 次重复最大 (1RM) 和大腿近端 (MTP) 和远端 (MTD) 部分的 MT。对 16 次腿部训练的训练课程的感知用力评估 (RPE) 进行平均,以便进一步分析。两条腿的 MTP 均显著增加(估计差异:FAST:0.24cm,3.6%;SLOW:0.20cm,3.1%)。然而,对于 MTD,协方差分析显示腿效应(p=0.02),与 SLOW 相比,FAST 的前后绝对变化更大(估计差异:FAST 0.23cm,5.5%;SLOW:0.13cm,2.2%)。对于 1RM,两条腿的最大力量均显著增加(估计差异:FAST:9.1kg,17.0%;SLOW:10.4kg,22.1%,p≤0.0001)。SLOW 组的 RPE 高于 FAST 组(8.59 对 7.98,p=0.002)。尽管 RPE 存在差异,但我们的结果表明两种重复节奏都产生了相似的肌肉适应性。然而,它们还表明 FAST 节奏可能会在外侧四头肌处提供一个小的肥大优势。从实际角度来看,力量和调节专业人员可以在 8 周的训练期间在至少一个单关节运动中实施 FAST 节奏,以增强受过训练的个体的局部肥大适应性。