Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California.
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Dec 1;42(10):e1464-e1469. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003292.
The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is a health-related quality of life instrument used to detect changes in health status following otolaryngologic interventions. Despite its use in cochlear implant literature, assessment of utility, reliability, and validity of GBI in an adult cochlear implants (CI) patient population has yet to be performed.
Retrospective case series.
Academic, tertiary referral center.
Postlingually deafened, adult CI patients with at least 1 year of device use.
Five hundred fifty-two patients were administered GBI questionnaires at least 1 year following CI activation during follow-up visits.
GBI total and subscale scoring were compared to either the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults or Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. Moreover, a factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were performed to determine GBI validity and internal reliability, respectively.
The average overall GBI score was 38.6 ± 21.7. This was weakly correlated to the reduction in Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults/Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (τb = 0.282, p < 0.05). High factor loading with minimal cross-loading was noted on a three-factor solution, which emulated the original GBI development. Internal reliability was acceptable for the general benefit (α = 0.913) and social support subclasses (α = 0.706), whereas physical health's was low (α = 0.643).
Although GBI possesses adequate convergent and discriminant validity with acceptable reliability, its routine use to capture CI-specific health-related changes should not supersede validated CI-specific QoL instruments.
格拉斯哥受益量表(GBI)是一种用于检测耳鼻喉干预后健康状况变化的健康相关生活质量工具。尽管它在人工耳蜗植入文献中得到了应用,但尚未对成人人工耳蜗植入(CI)患者群体中的 GBI 的效用、可靠性和有效性进行评估。
回顾性病例系列。
学术性,三级转诊中心。
后天耳聋的成年 CI 患者,且至少有 1 年的设备使用经验。
在随访就诊期间,对 552 名患者在 CI 激活后至少 1 年进行 GBI 问卷评估。
GBI 总分和分量表评分与成人听力障碍问卷或老年听力障碍问卷进行比较。此外,还进行了因子分析和克朗巴赫α分析,以分别确定 GBI 的有效性和内部可靠性。
平均总体 GBI 评分为 38.6±21.7。这与成人听力障碍问卷/老年听力障碍问卷的降低呈弱相关(τb=0.282,p<0.05)。在三因素解决方案中,注意到高因子负荷和最小交叉负荷,这模拟了原始 GBI 的发展。一般受益(α=0.913)和社会支持子类(α=0.706)的内部可靠性可接受,而身体健康的内部可靠性较低(α=0.643)。
尽管 GBI 具有足够的收敛和判别有效性,且可靠性可接受,但将其常规用于捕捉 CI 特定的健康相关变化不应替代经过验证的 CI 特定的 QoL 工具。