Biezen Ruby, Buising Kirsty, Monaghan Tim, Ball Rachael, Thursky Karin, Cheah Ron, Clark Malcolm, Manski-Nankervis Jo-Anne
Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jul 16;10(7):867. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10070867.
Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing contributes to increasing antimicrobial resistance. An antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program in the form of quality improvement activities that included audit and feedback, clinical decision support and education was developed to help optimise prescribing in general practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of this program (Guidance GP) in three general practices in Melbourne, Australia, between November 2019 and August 2020. Thirty-one general practitioners (GPs) participated in the program, with 11 GPs and three practice managers participating in follow-up focus groups and interviews to explore the acceptability and feasibility of the program. Our findings showed that the quality improvement activities were acceptable to GPs, if they accurately fit GPs' decision-making process and workflow. It was also important that they provided clinically meaningful information in the form of audit and feedback to GPs. The time needed to coordinate the program, and costs to implement the program were some of the potential barriers identified. Facilitators of success were a "whole of practice" approach with enthusiastic GPs and practice staff, and an identified practice champion. The findings of this research will inform implementation strategies for both the Guidance GP program and AMS programs more broadly in Australian general practice, which will be critical for general practice participation and engagement.
不恰当的抗菌药物处方导致抗菌药物耐药性增加。一项以质量改进活动形式开展的抗菌药物管理(AMS)项目得以开发,这些活动包括审核与反馈、临床决策支持和教育,旨在帮助优化全科医疗中的处方。本研究的目的是评估该项目(《全科医疗指南》)于2019年11月至2020年8月期间在澳大利亚墨尔本的三家全科医疗诊所的实施情况。31名全科医生参与了该项目,11名全科医生和3名诊所经理参与了后续的焦点小组讨论和访谈,以探讨该项目的可接受性和可行性。我们的研究结果表明,如果质量改进活动能准确契合全科医生的决策过程和工作流程,那么这些活动是全科医生可以接受的。同样重要的是,这些活动要以审核和反馈的形式向全科医生提供具有临床意义的信息。协调该项目所需的时间以及实施该项目的成本是已识别出的一些潜在障碍。成功的促进因素包括全科医生和诊所工作人员积极参与的“全科诊所整体”方法,以及确定的诊所倡导者。本研究的结果将为《全科医疗指南》项目以及澳大利亚全科医疗中更广泛的AMS项目的实施策略提供参考,这对于全科医疗的参与和投入至关重要。