Suppr超能文献

内异症疼痛4D问卷:一种用于评估子宫内膜异位症疼痛的新的经过验证的工具。

The ENDOPAIN 4D Questionnaire: A New Validated Tool for Assessing Pain in Endometriosis.

作者信息

Puchar Anne, Panel Pierre, Oppenheimer Anne, Du Cheyron Joseph, Fritel Xavier, Fauconnier Arnaud

机构信息

EA 7285 Research Unit 'Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health', Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, 78150 Le Chesnay, France.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 21;10(15):3216. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153216.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the measurement properties, the responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference of the ENDOPAIN-4D: a new questionnaire for assessing pain in endometriosis.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, multicentre study was conducted including all women ≥18 years consulting for symptomatic proven endometriosis between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018 and volunteering to participate. Each patient had to answer a new self-administered patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires (the ENDOPAIN-4D) at inclusion (T0) and 12 months after medical or surgical treatment (T1). Criteria defined by COSMIN were used to validate the questionnaire's measurement properties. The minimal clinically important difference was estimated by the anchor-based method.

RESULTS

The study included 199 women. The ENDOPAIN-4D score had a four dimensional structure with good internal consistency (measured by Cronbach α): (I) pain-related disability (α = 0.79), (II) painful bowel symptoms (α = 0.80), (III) dyspareunia (α = 0.83), and (IV) painful urinary tract symptoms (α = 0.77). They produced four subscores that can be summed to obtain a single score (α = 0.61). The ENDOPAIN-4D total score ranged from 0 to 94.00 (mean ± SD: 46.7 ± 22). The total score was significantly correlated with the PROs used in endometriosis. Sensitivity to change was good with large effect sizes (ES) (mean of the differences: 36.3 = 1.8 10, ES 0.76). The minimal clinically important difference of the global score was determined to be 10.9.

CONCLUSIONS

The ENDOPAIN-4D questionnaire is easy to use, valid, and effective in assessing patient reported pain symptoms in women treated for endometriosis. This new instrument can be used as the primary outcome for future clinical trials and as a tool for routine patient follow-up.

摘要

目的

研究ENDOPAIN-4D的测量属性、反应性和最小临床重要差异,ENDOPAIN-4D是一种用于评估子宫内膜异位症疼痛的新问卷。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究,纳入2017年1月1日至2018年6月30日期间因症状性确诊子宫内膜异位症前来咨询且自愿参与的所有18岁及以上女性。每位患者在纳入时(T0)以及药物或手术治疗12个月后(T1)必须回答一份新的自我管理的患者报告结局(PRO)问卷(ENDOPAIN-4D)。采用COSMIN定义的标准来验证问卷的测量属性。通过基于锚定的方法估计最小临床重要差异。

结果

该研究纳入了199名女性。ENDOPAIN-4D评分具有四维结构,内部一致性良好(通过Cronbach α测量):(I)疼痛相关残疾(α = 0.79),(II)肠道疼痛症状(α = 0.80),(III)性交困难(α = 0.83),以及(IV)尿路疼痛症状(α = 0.77)。它们产生了四个子评分,可将其相加以获得单个评分(α = 0.61)。ENDOPAIN-4D总分范围为0至94.00(均值±标准差:46.7±22)。总分与子宫内膜异位症中使用的PROs显著相关。对变化的敏感性良好,效应量(ES)较大(差异均值:36.3 = 1.8 10,ES 0.76)。全局评分的最小临床重要差异确定为10.9。

结论

ENDOPAIN-4D问卷易于使用,在评估接受子宫内膜异位症治疗的女性患者报告的疼痛症状方面有效且可靠。这种新工具可作为未来临床试验的主要结局指标以及常规患者随访的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a0c/8348422/57e622f3bcce/jcm-10-03216-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验