Visco-Comandini Federica, Gragnani Andrea, Giacomantonio Mauro, Romano Giuseppe, Petrucci Manuel, Mancini Francesco
Associazione Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva (SPC), Rome, Italy.
Department of Human Sciences, Marconi University, Rome, Italy.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 23;12:621282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.621282. eCollection 2021.
Depressive states represent a normal and physiological response to the experience of loss. However, it is possible to identify some elements that allow distinguishing physiological depressive states from pathological ones. Over the years, research has confirmed that a stable tendency to negative self-evaluation is a transdiagnostic factor that triggers and amplifies dysfunctional emotional reactivity, thus contributing to the shift from normal to pathological reaction. In this sense, the secondary problem, or , referring to the negative evaluation of one's depressive state and the consequent dysfunctional attempts to solve it, seems to play an important role. The aim of the present study is to investigate how dysfunctional beliefs and the evaluations of depressive symptoms () are related to depression severity. We asked to a community sample to focus on the depressive symptoms they regard as most distressful and evaluate them through specific questionnaires. One-hundred and eighty nine participants were asked to complete a set of questionnaires: (1) the Meta-Emotional Problem Questionnaire; (2) the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; (3) the Beck Depression Inventory; (4) the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale-24 in order to investigate the relation between dysfunctional beliefs, meta-emotional problems, and depressive symptoms severity. Our results show that higher levels of depression are associated both to more pervasive dysfunctional attitudes and increased evaluation of . In addition, we conduct a regression analysis to disentangle the impact of the two different measures of depressive symptoms (i.e., BDI-II and CES-D) with two explanatory variables (dysfunctional attitudes and ). Results show that remains a significant and robust predictor of the severity of depressive symptomatology, while dysfunctional beliefs has a rather weak and non-significant relation with the criterion. In other words, consistently explains the higher variance of depressive symptoms than dysfunctional beliefs. In conclusion, our study shows a clear link between and depression severity. This is relevant for clinical practice, as it highlights the importance of specifically targeting beliefs about the depressive condition in cognitive-behavioral treatment of depression, since they represent crucial factors maintaining depressive symptomatologies.
抑郁状态是对丧失经历的一种正常生理反应。然而,有可能识别出一些要素,以便区分生理性抑郁状态和病理性抑郁状态。多年来,研究证实,消极自我评价的稳定倾向是一个跨诊断因素,它会引发并放大功能失调的情绪反应,从而促使从正常反应转变为病理性反应。从这个意义上说,继发性问题,即对自身抑郁状态的消极评价以及随之而来的解决该问题的功能失调尝试,似乎起着重要作用。本研究的目的是调查功能失调信念和对抑郁症状的评价()与抑郁严重程度之间的关系。我们要求一个社区样本关注他们认为最困扰的抑郁症状,并通过特定问卷对其进行评估。189名参与者被要求完成一组问卷:(1)元情绪问题问卷;(2)流行病学研究中心抑郁量表;(3)贝克抑郁量表;(4)功能失调态度量表 - 24,以调查功能失调信念、元情绪问题和抑郁症状严重程度之间的关系。我们的结果表明,更高水平的抑郁与更普遍的功能失调态度以及对的评价增加相关。此外,我们进行了回归分析,以厘清抑郁症状的两种不同测量方法(即BDI - II和CES - D)与两个解释变量(功能失调态度和)的影响。结果表明,仍然是抑郁症状严重程度的一个显著且稳健的预测指标,而功能失调信念与该标准的关系相当微弱且不显著。换句话说,与功能失调信念相比,始终能解释抑郁症状更高的方差。总之,我们的研究表明与抑郁严重程度之间存在明显联系。这对临床实践具有重要意义,因为它凸显了在抑郁症的认知行为治疗中专门针对关于抑郁状况的信念的重要性,因为它们是维持抑郁症状的关键因素。