Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be) University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2021 Nov;15(11):900-914. doi: 10.1002/term.3236. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
The introduction of recombinant human growth and differentiation factors (rhGFs) for intrabony defects regeneration has represented a considerable breakthrough in recent years. However, they have been used in different concentrations, doses and combined with various scaffolds, and there is no evidence on which the most effective formulation for periodontal regeneration is. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate and rank the various formulations of such bioactive agents through network meta-analysis of clinical studies. The protocol registration was done on PROSPERO with registration ID CRD42020213753. To report NMA, we followed PRISMA guidelines and searched PUBMED, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central electronic databases. Studies were screened based on specific inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes extracted from included studies were the most common indexes for periodontal regeneration (PPD, CAL, %bone filling). The NMA analysis included network plots, contribution plots, inconsistency plots (if eligible to form the loop), predictive interval plots, SUCRA rankings and multidimensional scale ranking (MDS) plots. SUCRA would demonstrate the rankings of multiple competing bioactive agents based on their best performance. Twelve clinical studies for qualitative and quantitative analysis were considered. Network meta-analysis found that rhFGF + hyaluronic acid was ranked highest in PPD and CAL outcome. rhPDGF-BB + β-tricalcium phosphate was ranked highest in the percentage of bone filling. In addition, all bioactive agents performed better than control groups without rhGFs. Despite clear benefits deriving from rhGFs for periodontal regeneration, the present results should be interpreted with caution due to several confounding factors affecting the outcome. Nevertheless, further well designed randomized clinical trials will allow establishing guidelines for an appropriate indication of the use of rhGFs.
近年来,重组人生长分化因子(rhGFs)在骨内缺损再生中的应用取得了重大突破。然而,它们的应用浓度、剂量不同,与各种支架结合使用,目前尚无证据表明哪种配方对牙周再生最有效。因此,我们旨在通过对临床研究的网络荟萃分析来评估和排列这些生物活性制剂的各种配方。方案注册在 PROSPERO 上进行,注册号为 CRD42020213753。为了报告 NMA,我们遵循 PRISMA 指南,并在 PUBMED、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Central 电子数据库中进行了搜索。根据具体纳入标准筛选研究。从纳入研究中提取的主要结果是牙周再生最常见的指标(PPD、CAL、%骨填充)。NMA 分析包括网络图、贡献图、不一致性图(如果符合形成环的条件)、预测区间图、SUCRA 排名和多维尺度排名(MDS)图。SUCRA 将根据其最佳表现对多个竞争生物活性制剂的排名进行展示。有 12 项临床研究用于定性和定量分析。网络荟萃分析发现,rhFGF+透明质酸在 PPD 和 CAL 结果方面排名最高。rhPDGF-BB+β-磷酸三钙在骨填充百分比方面排名最高。此外,所有生物活性制剂的表现均优于不含 rhGFs 的对照组。尽管 rhGFs 对牙周再生有明显的益处,但由于影响结果的几个混杂因素,目前的结果应谨慎解释。然而,进一步的精心设计的随机临床试验将为 rhGFs 的适当应用指征建立指南。