Mifsud Justin Lee, Stephenson John, Astin Felicity, Galea Joseph
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Aug 9;7(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00874-4.
Research has consistently demonstrated that preventive cardiology programs have limited success, and healthy practices among high-risk individuals remain suboptimal. Furthermore, there are no current programmes in Malta that offer support to first-degree relatives of patients with premature coronary heart disease. This internal pilot study will determine the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of a preventative intervention.
METHODS/DESIGN: We are conducting a 12-month single-centre, two-armed group randomised controlled trial (RCT), recruiting a sample of 100 asymptomatic first-degree relatives of patients with premature coronary heart disease (CHD). The study seeks to test an evidence-based intervention to reduce modifiable risk and determine its feasibility and acceptability. The Intervention will be delivered at an outpatient office based in a large acute academic hospital. It will comprise risk communication using an online risk calculator, a counselling style adapted from motivational interviewing, and 12 weekly telephone goal reinforcement calls (3 months). Control subjects will receive verbal lifestyle advice only. Feasibility will be assessed through recruitment and retention. Qualitative evaluation interviews will be conducted with a subsample of 24 purposefully selected participants at 12 months. Assessment for risk factor changes will be measured at pre-intervention and 6 and 12 months. Associations between variables will also be assessed descriptively.
Preventive cardiology guidelines highlighted the importance of lifestyle interventions, and lifestyle intervention adherence was proven to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, regardless of the individual's genetic risk. Preventive cardiology programmes may fail to adequately support persons in modifying risky behaviours, and research demonstrates that healthy practices among high-risk individuals can remain suboptimal. Siblings and offspring of patients with premature CHD are at increased risk of ASCVD. Despite this, there is no process in place for routine screening and support to modify risk. It is hypothesised that participants assigned to the intervention arm will show more cardio-protective lifestyle-related improvement from the baseline than those in the control group. To date, this is the first trial being conducted amongst Maltese first-degree relatives. This study addresses the needed research, and the results will inform a definitive trial. The funding institution is the University of Malta.
ISRCTN, ISRCTN21559170 ; Registered 06/08/2020.
研究一直表明,预防心脏病学项目的成效有限,高危人群的健康行为仍未达到最佳状态。此外,马耳他目前没有为早发性冠心病患者的一级亲属提供支持的项目。这项内部试点研究将确定一项预防性干预措施的可行性、可接受性和潜在效果。
方法/设计:我们正在进行一项为期12个月的单中心、双臂组随机对照试验(RCT),招募100名早发性冠心病(CHD)患者的无症状一级亲属作为样本。该研究旨在测试一种基于证据的干预措施,以降低可改变的风险,并确定其可行性和可接受性。干预将在一家大型急性学术医院的门诊办公室进行。它将包括使用在线风险计算器进行风险沟通、采用源自动机性访谈的咨询方式,以及为期12周的每周一次电话目标强化呼叫(共3个月)。对照组受试者仅接受口头生活方式建议。将通过招募和留存情况评估可行性。将在12个月时对24名有目的地挑选出的参与者子样本进行定性评估访谈。将在干预前、干预后6个月及12个月测量风险因素变化评估。还将对变量之间的关联进行描述性评估。
预防心脏病学指南强调了生活方式干预的重要性,并且已证明坚持生活方式干预可降低动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险,无论个体的遗传风险如何。预防心脏病学项目可能无法充分支持人们改变危险行为,而且研究表明高危人群的健康行为仍可能未达到最佳状态。早发性冠心病患者的兄弟姐妹和后代患ASCVD的风险增加。尽管如此,目前尚无常规筛查和支持以改变风险的流程。据推测,被分配到干预组的参与者与对照组相比,从基线开始在与心脏保护相关的生活方式方面会有更大改善。迄今为止,这是在马耳他一级亲属中进行的第一项试验。本研究解决了所需的研究问题,其结果将为一项确定性试验提供参考。资助机构是马耳他大学。
ISRCTN,ISRCTN21559170;于2020年8月6日注册。