Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Sep;91:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.06.042. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
Following a decompressive craniectomy (DC), the harvested bone flap is stored for future cranioplasty. There are two different methods proposed for bone banking, namely subcutaneous pocketing (SP) in the abdominal wall and cryopreservation (CP) in a refrigerator. This study was designed to evaluate the risk of developing infection in each study group.
In this randomized clinical trial design, a total of 143 patients underwent a primary decompressive craniectomy. Thereafter, they were randomly allocated into two groups, as SP and CP, and they were then scheduled for a future cranioplasty. Next, 108 patients underwent cranioplasty using an autologous bone flap and then followed-up for 18 months. Some variables, including demographic data, indications for primary DC, rate of post-operative clinical infection, bacterial culture results, the interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, post-operative hospitalization duration, new morbidities, mortality rate, bone flap resorption rate, and several possible associated risk factors, were also recorded. The obtained data were analyzed by an expert bio-statistician using proper bio-statistical methods. A P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Four patients in the cryopreservation group (n = 50) indicated post-operative bone flap infection (8%), which was statistically significant (P = 0.041). Accordingly, all of them were resulted as positive for Methicillin-Resistant-Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Using the subcutaneous pocket method, no post-operative infection was observed after cranioplasty. The overall postoperative infection rate was estimated as 4%. The mean of age in the post-operative infection group's participants was 50.25 years old, and in the non-infected, it was 34.93 years old, which was also significant (P = 0.048). Bone flap resorption (BFR) rate was found to be higher by the use of CP method in comparison to SP technique (p = 0.0001). Of note, no other risk factor was found attributable to a higher BFR rate (p-values > 0.05).
Older age and cryopreservation method at higher storage temperature (-18C˚) may be associated with infection's development after performing cranioplasty. BFR is more prevalent in the use of CP method rather than SP preservation technique.
去骨瓣减压术后,取下的骨瓣将被储存以备将来颅骨成形术使用。目前有两种不同的骨库储存方法,分别为腹壁皮下袋(SP)和冰箱冷藏(CP)。本研究旨在评估每组研究中发生感染的风险。
在这项随机临床试验设计中,共有 143 名患者接受了原发性去骨瓣减压术。此后,他们被随机分为 SP 和 CP 两组,并计划进行未来的颅骨成形术。然后,108 名患者使用自体骨瓣进行颅骨成形术,随后随访 18 个月。记录了一些变量,包括人口统计学数据、原发性去骨瓣减压术的指征、术后临床感染率、细菌培养结果、去骨瓣减压术和颅骨成形术之间的时间间隔、术后住院时间、新发并发症、死亡率、骨瓣吸收率以及几个可能的相关危险因素。由一位专家生物统计学家使用适当的生物统计方法对所获得的数据进行分析。P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
CP 组 4 例(n=50)患者术后出现骨瓣感染(8%),具有统计学意义(P=0.041)。因此,所有患者均对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)呈阳性。使用皮下袋法,颅骨成形术后未观察到感染。总体术后感染率估计为 4%。术后感染组患者的平均年龄为 50.25 岁,未感染组为 34.93 岁,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.048)。与 SP 技术相比,CP 方法的骨瓣吸收率(BFR)更高(p=0.0001)。值得注意的是,没有发现其他危险因素与更高的 BFR 率有关(p 值>0.05)。
年龄较大和储存温度较高(-18°C)的冷冻保存方法可能与颅骨成形术后感染的发生有关。CP 方法的 BFR 发生率高于 SP 保存技术。