Department of Preventive Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Center of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Caries Res. 2021;55(6):563-576. doi: 10.1159/000518964. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
Management of dental caries in adolescents presents a population health challenge; thus, it is important to use national epidemiological data to inform policy and action to improve oral health and address inequalities. The aims of this research were to examine dental caries clusters among 15-year-olds, taking account of caries thresholds, and explore associated factors to inform public health action. Secondary analysis of the oral health data on 2,160 15-year-olds from the 2013 Children's Dental Health Survey in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland was performed. Hierarchical cluster analysis of dental caries experience was conducted across all surfaces and at 4 decay diagnostic thresholds (clinical: International Caries Detection and Assessment System [ICDAS] 1-6, cavitated: ICDAS 3-6, obvious: ICDAS 4-6, and extensive obvious: ICDAS 5-6 decay). Ordered logistic regression was used to estimate the association of behavioural and psychosocial factors with the clusters generated in relation to both clinical and obvious decay experience which are of clinical and epidemiological relevance. A 4-cluster decay pattern representing "low" to "extremely high" decay experience was observed under each of the dental caries diagnostic criteria. For clinical decay, which includes visual enamel caries, 28.70% had low, 39.77% medium, 26.71% high, and 4.81% extremely high caries status. In the adjusted model, significant risk factors for clinical decay included non-modifiable (sex, region, school type, and area deprivation) and modifiable (higher sugar intake at 4 or more times per day and suboptimal dental attendance) factors. This study suggests 4 distinct dental caries patterns among adolescent children nationally. Dental caries clusters demonstrate the importance of embracing proportionate universalism in addressing dental caries in the population oral health strategy.
青少年龋齿管理是一个公共卫生挑战;因此,利用国家流行病学数据为改善口腔健康和解决不平等问题提供政策和行动依据非常重要。本研究旨在探讨考虑龋齿阈值的 15 岁青少年龋齿簇,并探索相关因素以指导公共卫生行动。对英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰 2013 年儿童口腔健康调查中 2160 名 15 岁青少年的口腔健康数据进行了二次分析。对所有表面和 4 个龋齿诊断阈值(临床:国际龋齿检测和评估系统[ICDAS]1-6、龋洞:ICDAS 3-6、明显:ICDAS 4-6、广泛明显:ICDAS 5-6 龋齿)进行了龋齿经验的层次聚类分析。有序逻辑回归用于估计行为和心理社会因素与与临床和明显龋齿经验相关的簇的关联,这些簇具有临床和流行病学意义。在每个龋齿诊断标准下,观察到代表“低”到“极高”龋齿经验的 4 个龋齿模式。对于包括釉质龋在内的临床龋齿,28.70%的龋齿状态低,39.77%的龋齿状态中等,26.71%的龋齿状态高,4.81%的龋齿状态极高。在调整后的模型中,临床龋齿的显著危险因素包括不可改变的(性别、地区、学校类型和地区贫困)和可改变的(每天 4 次或更多次摄入较高的糖和不适当的牙科就诊)因素。本研究表明,全国青少年儿童存在 4 种不同的龋齿模式。龋齿簇表明,在人群口腔健康策略中,接受相称的普遍性原则对于解决龋齿问题非常重要。