Suppr超能文献

南非腹部手术患者中术前洗必泰含漱液预防术后肺炎的成本效果初步模型评估。

Preliminary model assessing the cost-effectiveness of preoperative chlorhexidine mouthwash at reducing postoperative pneumonia among abdominal surgery patients in South Africa.

机构信息

National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom.

Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0254698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254698. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is a common and severe complication of abdominal surgery, it is associated with increased length of hospital stay, healthcare costs, and mortality. Further, pulmonary complication rates have risen during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This study explored the potential cost-effectiveness of administering preoperative chlorhexidine mouthwash versus no-mouthwash at reducing postoperative pneumonia among abdominal surgery patients.

METHODS

A decision analytic model taking the South African healthcare provider perspective was constructed to compare costs and benefits of mouthwash versus no-mouthwash-surgery at 30 days after abdominal surgery. We assumed two scenarios: (i) the absence of COVID-19; (ii) the presence of COVID-19. Input parameters were collected from published literature including prospective cohort studies and expert opinion. Effectiveness was measured as proportion of pneumonia patients. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of parameter uncertainties. The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis were presented using cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

RESULTS

In the absence of COVID-19, mouthwash had lower average costs compared to no-mouthwash-surgery, $3,675 (R 63,770) versus $3,958 (R 68,683), and lower proportion of pneumonia patients, 0.029 versus 0.042 (dominance of mouthwash intervention). In the presence of COVID-19, the increase in pneumonia rate due to COVID-19, made mouthwash more dominant as it was more beneficial to reduce pneumonia patients through administering mouthwash. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves shown that mouthwash surgery is likely to be cost-effective between $0 (R0) and $15,000 (R 260,220) willingness to pay thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the absence and presence of SARS-CoV-2, mouthwash is likely to be cost saving intervention for reducing pneumonia after abdominal surgery. However, the available evidence for the effectiveness of mouthwash was extrapolated from cardiac surgery; there is now an urgent need for a robust clinical trial on the intervention on non-cardiac surgery.

摘要

背景

肺炎是腹部手术后常见且严重的并发症,它与住院时间延长、医疗保健费用增加和死亡率升高有关。此外,在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,肺部并发症的发生率有所上升。本研究探讨了术前使用洗必泰口腔冲洗与不进行口腔冲洗在减少腹部手术后肺炎方面的潜在成本效益。

方法

从南非医疗保健提供者的角度出发,构建了一个决策分析模型,比较了腹部手术后 30 天内使用口腔冲洗与不进行口腔冲洗手术的成本和效益。我们假设了两种情况:(i)不存在 COVID-19;(ii)存在 COVID-19。输入参数来自已发表的文献,包括前瞻性队列研究和专家意见。有效性以肺炎患者的比例来衡量。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析,以评估参数不确定性的影响。概率敏感性分析的结果使用成本效益平面和成本效益可接受性曲线呈现。

结果

在不存在 COVID-19 的情况下,与不进行口腔冲洗手术相比,口腔冲洗的平均成本更低,为 3675 美元(63770 南非兰特),而不进行口腔冲洗手术的成本为 3958 美元(68683 南非兰特),并且肺炎患者的比例也更低,为 0.029 比 0.042(口腔冲洗干预的优势)。在存在 COVID-19 的情况下,由于 COVID-19 导致的肺炎发生率增加,口腔冲洗更加占优势,因为通过进行口腔冲洗可以更有效地减少肺炎患者。成本效益可接受性曲线表明,口腔冲洗手术在 0(零)至 15000 美元(260220 南非兰特)之间的支付意愿阈值下,很可能具有成本效益。

结论

无论是否存在 SARS-CoV-2,口腔冲洗都可能是一种降低腹部手术后肺炎的成本节约干预措施。然而,口腔冲洗有效性的现有证据是从心脏手术中推断出来的;现在迫切需要在非心脏手术中进行该干预措施的严格临床试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9475/8360544/29018213d1d1/pone.0254698.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验