Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Jun;29(3):921-933. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02729-0. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
In most Rubidium-(Rb)-positron emission tomography (PET) studies, dipyridamole was used as vasodilator. The aim was to evaluate vasodilator PET left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial blood flow (MBF), hemodynamics, and the influence of adenosine and regadenoson on these variables.
Consecutive patients (N = 2299) with prior coronary artery disease (CAD) or no prior CAD undergoing adenosine/regadenoson Rb-PET were studied and compared according to CAD status and normal/abnormal PET (summed stress score 0-3 vs. ≥4). Rest and stress LVEF differed significantly depending on CAD status and scan results. In patients with no prior CAD, rest/stress LVEF were 68% and 72%, in patients with prior CAD 60% and 63%. LVEF during stress increased 5 ± 6% in normal compared to 1 ± 8% in abnormal PET (P<0.001). Global rest myocardial blood flow(rMBF), stress MBF(sMBF) and myocardial flow reserve (sMBF/rMBF) were significantly higher in no prior CAD patients compared to prior CAD patients(1.3 ± 0.5, 3.3 ± 0.9, 2.6 ± 0.8 and 1.2 ± 0.4, 2.6 ± 0.8, 2.4 ± 0.8 ml/g/min, respectively, P<0.001) and in normal versus abnormal scans, irrespective of CAD status(no prior CAD: 1.4 ± 0.5, 3.5 ± 0.8, 2.8 ± 0.8 and 1.2 ± 0.8, 2.5 ± 0.8, 2.2 ± 0.7; prior CAD: 1.3 ± 0.4, 3.1 ± 0.8, 2.7 ± 0.8 and 1.1 ± 0.4, 2.3 ± 0.7, 2.2 ± 0.7 ml/g/min, respectively, P<0.001). LVEF and hemodynamic values were similar for adenosine and regadenoson stress. Stress LVEF ≥70% excluded relevant ischemia (≥10%) with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% (CI 92-95%).
Rest/stress LVEF, LVEF reserve and MBF values are lower in abnormal compared to normal scans. Adenosine and regadenoson seem to have similar effect on stress LVEF, MBF and hemodynamics. A stress LVEF ≥70% has a high NPV to exclude relevant ischemia.
在大多数铷(Rb)-正电子发射断层扫描(PET)研究中,使用双嘧达莫作为血管扩张剂。目的是评估血管扩张剂 PET 左心室射血分数(LVEF)、心肌血流(MBF)、血液动力学以及腺苷和雷腺苷对这些变量的影响。
连续纳入 2299 例既往有冠心病(CAD)或无 CAD 病史的患者,行腺苷/雷腺苷 Rb-PET,根据 CAD 状态和正常/异常 PET(总和应激评分 0-3 与≥4)进行比较。无论 CAD 状态如何,静息和应激 LVEF 差异均有统计学意义。无 CAD 病史患者的静息/应激 LVEF 分别为 68%和 72%,CAD 病史患者分别为 60%和 63%。与异常 PET 相比,正常 PET 时的 LVEF 应激增加了 5±6%(P<0.001)。无 CAD 病史患者的静息心肌血流(rMBF)、应激 MBF(sMBF)和心肌血流储备(sMBF/rMBF)均明显高于 CAD 病史患者(分别为 1.3±0.5、3.3±0.9、2.6±0.8 和 1.2±0.4、2.6±0.8、2.4±0.8 ml/g/min,P<0.001),无论 CAD 状态如何,正常扫描时均高于异常扫描(无 CAD 病史:分别为 1.4±0.5、3.5±0.8、2.8±0.8 和 1.2±0.8、2.5±0.8、2.2±0.7;CAD 病史:分别为 1.3±0.4、3.1±0.8、2.7±0.8 和 1.1±0.4、2.3±0.7、2.2±0.7 ml/g/min,P<0.001)。腺苷和雷腺苷的应激 LVEF 和血液动力学值相似。应激 LVEF≥70%可排除≥10%的相关缺血,阴性预测值(NPV)为 94%(92-95%CI)。
与正常扫描相比,异常扫描时静息/应激 LVEF、LVEF 储备和 MBF 值较低。腺苷和雷腺苷似乎对应激 LVEF、MBF 和血液动力学有相似的影响。应激 LVEF≥70%对排除相关缺血具有较高的 NPV。