Suppr超能文献

Ⅰ 期食管鳞癌手术与放化疗的平行对照临床试验

Parallel-Group Controlled Trial of Surgery Versus Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Esophageal Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1878-1886.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Surgery is the standard of care for T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), whereas chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a treatment option. This trial aimed to investigate the noninferiority of CRT relative to surgery for T1bN0M0 ESCC.

METHODS

Clinical T1bN0M0 ESCC patients were eligible for enrollment in this prospective nonrandomized controlled study of surgery versus CRT. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was determined using inverse probability weighting with propensity scoring. Surgery consisted of an esophagectomy with 2- or 3-field lymph node dissection. CRT consisted of 2 courses of 5-fluorouracil (700 mg/m) on days 1-4 and cisplatin (70 mg/m) on day 1 every 4 weeks with concurrent radiation (60 Gy).

RESULTS

From December 20, 2006 to February 5, 2013, a total of 368 patients were enrolled in the nonrandomized portion of the study. The patient characteristics in surgery arm and CRT arm, respectively, were as follows: median age, 62 and 65 years; proportion of males, 82.8% and 88.1%; and proportion of performance status 0, 99.5% and 98.1%. Comparisons were made using the nonrandomized groups. The 5-year overall survival rate was 86.5% in the surgery arm and 85.5% in the CRT arm (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.64 [<1.78]). The complete response rate in the CRT arm was 87.3% (95% confidence interval, 81.1-92.1). The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 81.7% in the surgery arm and 71.6% in the CRT arm. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 2 patients in the surgery arm and none in the CRT arm.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT is noninferior to surgery and should be considered for the treatment of T1bN0M0 ESCC.

摘要

背景与目的

手术是 T1bN0M0 食管鳞癌(ESCC)的标准治疗方法,而放化疗(CRT)是一种治疗选择。本试验旨在研究 CRT 相对于手术治疗 T1bN0M0 ESCC 的非劣效性。

方法

符合条件的临床 T1bN0M0 ESCC 患者可参加本前瞻性非随机对照研究,比较手术与 CRT。主要终点为总生存,采用逆概率加权和倾向评分进行评估。手术包括食管切除术和 2 或 3 野淋巴结清扫。CRT 包括氟尿嘧啶(700 mg/m)第 1-4 天和顺铂(70 mg/m)第 1 天,每 4 周 2 个疗程,同时进行放疗(60 Gy)。

结果

从 2006 年 12 月 20 日至 2013 年 2 月 5 日,共有 368 例患者被纳入非随机部分的研究。手术组和 CRT 组的患者特征分别为:中位年龄 62 岁和 65 岁;男性比例分别为 82.8%和 88.1%;功能状态 0 级的比例分别为 99.5%和 98.1%。采用非随机组进行比较。手术组的 5 年总生存率为 86.5%,CRT 组为 85.5%(调整后的危险比为 1.05;95%置信区间为 0.67-1.64[<1.78])。CRT 组完全缓解率为 87.3%(95%置信区间为 81.1-92.1)。手术组的 5 年无进展生存率为 81.7%,CRT 组为 71.6%。手术组有 2 例治疗相关死亡,CRT 组无死亡。

结论

CRT 不劣于手术,应考虑用于治疗 T1bN0M0 ESCC。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验