Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Nov;90(11):2704-2717. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13577. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
Theory indicates that competing species coexist in a community when intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. When body size determines the outcome of competitive interactions between individuals, coexistence depends also on how resource use and the ability to compete for these resources change with body size. Testing coexistence theory in size-structured communities, therefore, requires disentangling the effects of size-dependent competitive abilities and niche shifts. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the evolution of species- and size-dependent competitive asymmetries increased the likelihood of coexistence between interacting species. We experimentally estimated the effects of size-dependent competitive interactions on somatic growth rates of two interacting fish species, Trinidadian guppies Poecilia reticulata and killifish Rivulus hartii. We controlled for the effects of size-dependent changes in the niche at two competitive settings representing the early (allopatric) and late (sympatric) evolutionary stages of a killifish-guppy community. We fitted the growth data to a model that incorporates species- and size-dependent competitive asymmetries to test whether changes in the competitive interactions across sizes increased the likelihood of species coexistence from allopatry to sympatry. We found that guppies are competitively superior to killifish but were less so in sympatric populations. The decrease in the effects of interspecific competition on the fitness of killifish and increase in the interspecific effect on guppies' fitness increased the likelihood that sympatric guppies and killifish will coexist. However, while the competitive asymmetries between the species changed consistently between allopatry and sympatry between drainages, the magnitude of the size-dependent competitive asymmetries varied between drainages. These results demonstrate the importance of integrating evolution and trait-based interactions into the research on how species coexist.
理论表明,当种内竞争强于种间竞争时,竞争物种会在群落中共存。当个体间的竞争结果由体型决定时,共存还取决于资源利用方式以及争夺这些资源的能力如何随体型变化而变化。因此,在具有体型结构的群落中检验共存理论,需要理清体型依赖的竞争能力和生态位分化的影响。在这里,我们检验了一个假设,即物种和体型依赖的竞争不对称性的进化增加了相互作用的物种共存的可能性。我们通过实验估计了体型依赖的竞争相互作用对两种相互作用的鱼类——特立尼达孔雀鱼 Poecilia reticulata 和丽鱼 Rivulus hartii 的体生长率的影响。我们在两个竞争环境中控制了体型依赖性的生态位变化的影响,这两个竞争环境代表了丽鱼-孔雀鱼群落的早期(异域)和晚期(同域)进化阶段。我们将生长数据拟合到一个模型中,该模型纳入了物种和体型依赖的竞争不对称性,以检验在不同体型之间的竞争相互作用的变化是否增加了从异域到同域的物种共存的可能性。我们发现,孔雀鱼在竞争上优于丽鱼,但在同域种群中则不那么占优势。种间竞争对丽鱼适应性的影响减小,而对孔雀鱼适应性的种间影响增大,这增加了同域的孔雀鱼和丽鱼共存的可能性。然而,虽然物种之间的竞争不对称性在异域和排水系统之间的同域种群中始终发生变化,但体型依赖的竞争不对称性的幅度在不同排水系统之间有所不同。这些结果表明,将进化和基于性状的相互作用整合到关于物种如何共存的研究中非常重要。