Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Institute for diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 11, 97080, Wuerzburg,, Germany.
Fluids Barriers CNS. 2021 Aug 14;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12987-021-00268-x.
The etiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) remains unclear. Little is known about the pre-symptomatic stage. This study aimed to investigate the association of neuropsychological data with iNPH-characteristic imaging changes compared to normal imaging and unspecific atrophy in a healthy population.
We extracted data from the community-dwelling Austrian Stroke Prevention Family Study (ASPS-Fam) database (2006-2010). All subjects underwent a baseline and identical follow-up examination after 3-5 years with MR imaging and an extensive neuropsychological test battery (Trail Making Test B, short physical performance balance, walking speed, memory, visuo-practical skills, composite scores of executive function and g-factor). We categorized the subjects into "iNPH"-associated, non-specific "atrophy," and "normal" based on the rating of different radiological cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space parameters. We noted how the categories developed over time. We assessed the association of the image categories with the neuropsychological data, different demographic, and lifestyle parameters (age, sex, education, alcohol intake, arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia), and the extent of white matter hyperintensities. We investigated whether neuropsychological data associated with the image categories were independent from other parameters as confounders.
One hundred and thirteen subjects, aged 50-70 years, were examined. The imaging category "iNPH" was only present at follow-up. A third of subjects with "atrophy" at baseline changed to the category "iNPH" at follow-up. More white matter hyperintensities (WMH) were present in later "iNPH" subjects. Subjects with "iNPH" performed worse than "normal" subjects on executive function (p = 0.0118), memory (p = 0.0109), and Trail Making Test B (TMT-B. p < 0.0001). Education, alcohol intake, diabetes, arterial hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia had no effect. Age, number of females, and the extent of white matter hyperintensities were higher in "iNPH" than in "normal" subjects but did not significantly confound the neuropsychological results.
Apparent asymptomatic subjects with "iNPH" imaging characteristics presented with subclinical cognitive decline and showed worse executive function, memory, and TMT-B results than "normal" subjects. WMH seem to play a role in the etiology before ventriculomegaly. Clinical screening of individuals with incidental iNPH-characteristic imaging and conspicuous results sof these neurocognitive tests needs further validation.
特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)的病因仍不清楚。对于其前驱期知之甚少。本研究旨在调查与 iNPH 特征性影像学改变相关的神经心理学数据,与正常影像学和非特异性萎缩进行比较,以评估其在健康人群中的表现。
我们从社区居住的奥地利卒中预防家族研究(ASPS-Fam)数据库(2006-2010 年)中提取数据。所有受试者均在基线和 3-5 年后进行了相同的随访检查,包括磁共振成像(MRI)和广泛的神经心理学测试(Trail Making Test B、短程体能平衡、步行速度、记忆、视实践技能、执行功能综合评分和 g 因素)。我们根据不同的放射学脑脊液(CSF)空间参数的评分,将受试者分为“iNPH”相关、非特异性“萎缩”和“正常”。我们注意到这些类别是如何随时间发展的。我们评估了图像类别的神经心理学数据、不同的人口统计学和生活方式参数(年龄、性别、教育、饮酒、动脉高血压、高胆固醇血症)以及脑白质高信号(WMH)的程度之间的关系。我们还研究了神经心理学数据与图像类别的关联是否与其他参数(如混杂因素)独立。
113 名年龄在 50-70 岁的受试者接受了检查。影像学“iNPH”类别仅在随访时出现。基线时“萎缩”的三分之一受试者在随访时转变为“iNPH”类别。更严重的脑白质高信号(WMH)见于晚期“iNPH”患者。与“正常”组相比,“iNPH”组的执行功能(p=0.0118)、记忆(p=0.0109)和 Trail Making Test B(TMT-B,p<0.0001)更差。教育、饮酒、糖尿病、动脉高血压和高胆固醇血症没有影响。年龄、女性人数和脑白质高信号程度在“iNPH”组中高于“正常”组,但对神经心理学结果没有显著影响。
有 iNPH 影像学特征的无症状明显患者表现出亚临床认知能力下降,执行功能、记忆和 TMT-B 结果均较“正常”组差。WMH 在脑室扩大前可能在发病机制中起作用。需要进一步验证对偶然出现 iNPH 特征性影像学表现和这些神经认知测试明显结果的个体进行临床筛查。