Klyushnik T P, Zozulya S A, Oleichik I V, Levchenko N S, Subbotskaya N V, Barkhatova A N, Safarova T P, Omelchenko M A, Androsova L V
Mental Health Research Centre, Moscow, Russia.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2021;121(5. Vyp. 2):67-74. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202112105267.
The comparison of inflammatory markers in different age groups of patients with endogenous depression and correlation of immunological parameters with the clinical features of depression.
The study included 140 patients with endogenous depression (ED) (F21, F31-F34, ICD-10) aged 15 to 82 years (39.8±23 years), including 55 patients of adolescent age (18.9±2.8 years), 30 middle-aged patients (38.7±10.3 years) and 55 elderly patients (69.1±7.1 years). The total duration of the disease differed from 5 months to 45 years. Psychometric assessment of patients was carried out using HDRS. The control groups consisted of 143 healthy people aged 16 to 75 years. The activity of inflammatory markers leukocyte elastase (LE) and α1-proteinase inhibitor (α1-PI), their ratio (leukocyte-inhibitory index, LII), the levels of antibodies to S100B and myelin basic protein (MBP) were determined in blood.
Three immunological clusters were identified that correspond to different clinical variants of ED. A pro-inflammatory status with an activation of the leukocyte-inhibitory system is characteristic of 52.9% of patients (cluster 1). The clinical feature of this status is predominantly «classic» ED in the form of anxious, anxious-melancholic or anxious-apathetic depression without pronounced negative symptoms. Two other clusters are characterized by the imbalance of leukocyte-inhibitory system associated with insufficient a1-PI activity (cluster 2) and with insufficient LE activity (cluster 3). A common clinical feature of such ED is an atypical course with the predominance of apathetic-adynamic and dysphoric depression, the presence of negative disorders and a poor prognosis. The imbalance of leukocyte-inhibitory system associated with insufficient LE activity is typical mainly for elderly patients and is characterized by a longer duration of disease.
The status of leukocyte-inhibitory system of inflammation is correlated with the clinical features of ED in different age groups of patients. LII can be considered as an additional paraclinical criterion for differential diagnosis and prognosis of ED.
比较内源性抑郁症不同年龄组患者的炎症标志物,并研究免疫参数与抑郁症临床特征的相关性。
该研究纳入了140例年龄在15至82岁(39.8±23岁)的内源性抑郁症(ED)患者(F21、F31 - F34,ICD - 10),其中青少年患者55例(18.9±2.8岁),中年患者30例(38.7±10.3岁),老年患者55例(69.1±7.1岁)。病程从5个月到45年不等。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)对患者进行心理测量评估。对照组由143名年龄在16至75岁的健康人组成。测定血液中炎症标志物白细胞弹性蛋白酶(LE)和α1 - 抗蛋白酶抑制剂(α1 - PI)的活性、它们的比值(白细胞抑制指数,LII)、抗S100B和髓鞘碱性蛋白(MBP)抗体的水平。
确定了三个免疫集群,它们对应于ED的不同临床变体。52.9%的患者具有白细胞抑制系统激活的促炎状态(集群1)。这种状态的临床特征主要是“典型”的ED,表现为焦虑、焦虑 - 抑郁或焦虑 - 淡漠型抑郁,无明显阴性症状。另外两个集群的特征是白细胞抑制系统失衡,分别与α1 - PI活性不足(集群2)和LE活性不足(集群3)有关。这种ED的共同临床特征是非典型病程,以淡漠 - 动力不足和烦躁性抑郁为主,存在阴性症状且预后不良。与LE活性不足相关的白细胞抑制系统失衡主要在老年患者中典型,其特点是病程较长。
炎症的白细胞抑制系统状态与不同年龄组ED患者的临床特征相关。LII可被视为ED鉴别诊断和预后的额外辅助临床标准。