Suppr超能文献

基于黄体生成素的方案与传统的灵活型促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案在卵巢正常反应的女性中的比较:一项非劣效性试验的研究方案。

Luteinising hormone-based protocol versus traditional flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response: study protocol for a non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

Medical Center for Human Reproduction, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Medical Center for Human Reproduction, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e047974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047974.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many patients demonstrate an insufficient endogenous luteinising hormone (LH) concentration during ovarian stimulation. With traditional fixed or flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols, antagonist administration may further reduce LH activity. Previously, we proved that LH can be used as an indicator for the timing and dosage of antagonist. Patients with a persistently low LH concentration during ovarian stimulation may not require antagonists, whereas antagonist administration can affect reproductive outcomes. To further explore this hypothesis, we designed a randomised clinical trial to compare the LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol with traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study was a multicentre, parallel, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority study. The primary efficacy endpoint was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle. The study aimed to prove the non-inferiority of cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle with an LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Secondary endpoints were the high-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate and cancellation rate. Differences in cost-effectiveness and adverse events were evaluated. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle in women with normal ovarian response was 70%. Considering that a non-inferiority threshold should retain 80% of the clinical effect of a control treatment, a minimal clinical difference of 14% (one-sided: α, 2.5%; β, 20%) and a total of 338 patients were needed. Anticipating a 10% drop-out rate, the total number of patients required was 372.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Beijing Chao-Yang hospital. All participants in the trial will provide written informed consent. The study will be conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. Results of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800018077.

摘要

简介

许多患者在卵巢刺激过程中表现出内源性黄体生成素(LH)浓度不足。在传统的固定或灵活的促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂方案中,拮抗剂的给药可能会进一步降低 LH 活性。此前,我们已经证明 LH 可以作为拮抗剂给药时间和剂量的指标。在卵巢刺激过程中持续低 LH 浓度的患者可能不需要使用拮抗剂,而拮抗剂的给药会影响生殖结局。为了进一步验证这一假设,我们设计了一项随机临床试验,比较了 LH 基础的灵活 GnRH 拮抗剂方案与正常卵巢反应女性中传统的灵活 GnRH 拮抗剂方案。

方法和分析

这是一项多中心、平行、前瞻性、随机、非劣效性研究。主要疗效终点是每个周期的累积持续妊娠率。该研究旨在证明 LH 基础的灵活 GnRH 拮抗剂方案与传统的灵活 GnRH 拮抗剂方案在每个周期的累积持续妊娠率方面具有非劣效性。次要终点是优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率和取消率。评估了成本效益和不良事件的差异。正常卵巢反应女性的每个周期累积持续妊娠率为 70%。考虑到非劣效性阈值应保留对照治疗 80%的临床效果,最小临床差异为 14%(单侧:α,2.5%;β,20%),总共需要 338 名患者。预计 10%的脱落率,需要的总患者人数为 372 名。

伦理和传播

该试验已获得北京朝阳医院机构伦理委员会的批准。试验中的所有参与者都将提供书面知情同意书。该研究将按照《赫尔辛基宣言》及其修正案中概述的原则进行。本研究的结果将在同行评议的科学期刊上发表。

试验注册号

ChiCTR1800018077。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef54/8375742/3bbedabef37e/bmjopen-2020-047974f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验