Department of Autonomous Driving, KPIT Technologies, Pune 411057, India.
Centre for Data Science, Coventry University, Priory Road, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;21(16):5422. doi: 10.3390/s21165422.
Many advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are currently trying to utilise multi-sensor architectures, where the driver assistance algorithm receives data from a multitude of sensors. As mono-sensor systems cannot provide reliable and consistent readings under all circumstances because of errors and other limitations, fusing data from multiple sensors ensures that the environmental parameters are perceived correctly and reliably for most scenarios, thereby substantially improving the reliability of the multi-sensor-based automotive systems. This paper first highlights the significance of efficiently fusing data from multiple sensors in ADAS features. An emergency brake assist (EBA) system is showcased using multiple sensors, namely, a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor and camera. The architectures of the proposed 'centralised' and 'decentralised' sensor fusion approaches for EBA are discussed along with their constituents, i.e., the detection algorithms, the fusion algorithm, and the tracking algorithm. The centralised and decentralised architectures are built and analytically compared, and the performance of these two fusion architectures for EBA are evaluated in terms of speed of execution, accuracy, and computational cost. While both fusion methods are seen to drive the EBA application at an acceptable frame rate (~20 fps or higher) on an Intel i5-based Ubuntu system, it was concluded through the experiments and analytical comparisons that the decentralised fusion-driven EBA leads to higher accuracy; however, it has the downside of a higher computational cost. The centralised fusion-driven EBA yields comparatively less accurate results, but with the benefits of a higher frame rate and lesser computational cost.
许多先进的驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)目前都在尝试利用多传感器架构,其中驾驶辅助算法接收来自多个传感器的数据。由于单传感器系统由于误差和其他限制,无法在所有情况下提供可靠和一致的读数,因此融合来自多个传感器的数据可确保在大多数情况下正确可靠地感知环境参数,从而大大提高基于多传感器的汽车系统的可靠性。本文首先强调了在 ADAS 功能中高效融合来自多个传感器的数据的重要性。本文使用多个传感器(即激光雷达(LiDAR)传感器和摄像头)展示了紧急制动辅助(EBA)系统。讨论了用于 EBA 的“集中式”和“分散式”传感器融合方法的架构及其组成部分,即检测算法、融合算法和跟踪算法。构建了集中式和分散式架构,并进行了分析比较,并根据执行速度、准确性和计算成本来评估这两种融合架构对 EBA 的性能。虽然这两种融合方法都可以在基于 Intel i5 的 Ubuntu 系统上以可接受的帧率(约 20 fps 或更高)驱动 EBA 应用程序,但通过实验和分析比较得出的结论是,分散式融合驱动的 EBA 具有更高的准确性;然而,它的缺点是计算成本更高。集中式融合驱动的 EBA 产生的结果相对不太准确,但具有更高帧率和更低计算成本的优势。