Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Departamento de Ciencias, Facultad de Artes Liberales, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Peñalolén, Chile.
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Dec;90(12):2806-2818. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13583. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
Intraspecific variation, including individual diet variation, can structure populations and communities, but the causes and consequences of individual foraging strategies are often unclear. Interactions between competition and resources are thought to dictate foraging strategies (e.g. specialization vs. generalization), but classical paradigms such as optimal foraging and niche theory offer contrasting predictions for individual consumers. Furthermore, both paradigms assume that individual foraging strategies maximize fitness, yet this prediction is rarely tested. We used repeated stable isotope measurements (δ C, δ N; N = 3,509) and 6 years of capture-mark-recapture data to quantify the relationship between environmental variation, individual foraging and consumer fitness among four species of desert rodents. We tested the relative effects of intraspecific competition, interspecific competition, resource abundance and resource diversity on the foraging strategies of 349 individual animals, and then quantified apparent survival as function of individual foraging strategies. Consistent with niche theory, individuals contracted their trophic niches and increased foraging specialization in response to both intraspecific and interspecific competition, but this effect was offset by resource availability and individuals generalized when plant biomass was high. Nevertheless, individual specialists obtained no apparent fitness benefit from trophic niche contractions as the most specialized individuals exhibited a 10% reduction in monthly survival compared to the most generalized individuals. Ultimately, this resulted in annual survival probabilities nearly 4× higher for generalists compared to specialists. These results indicate that competition is the proximate driver of individual foraging strategies, and that diet-mediated fitness variation regulates population and community dynamics in stochastic resource environments. Furthermore, our findings show dietary generalism is a fitness maximizing strategy, suggesting that plastic foraging strategies may play a key role in species' ability to cope with environmental change.
种内变异,包括个体饮食变异,可以构建种群和群落,但个体觅食策略的原因和后果往往不清楚。竞争和资源之间的相互作用被认为决定了觅食策略(例如专业化与泛化),但经典的最优觅食和生态位理论为个体消费者提供了相互矛盾的预测。此外,这两个范式都假设个体觅食策略能使适应性最大化,但这一预测很少得到检验。我们使用重复的稳定同位素测量(δC、δN;N=3509)和 6 年的捕获-标记-再捕获数据,来量化环境变化、个体觅食和消费者适应性之间的关系,这些数据来自 4 种沙漠啮齿动物。我们检验了种内竞争、种间竞争、资源丰度和资源多样性对 349 只个体动物觅食策略的相对影响,然后量化了个体觅食策略对表观存活率的影响。与生态位理论一致,个体动物为了应对种内和种间竞争而缩小了它们的营养生态位,并增加了觅食的专业化,但这种效应被资源可用性抵消了,而且当植物生物量较高时,个体动物会泛化。然而,个体专业觅食者并没有从营养生态位的收缩中获得明显的适应性收益,因为最专业化的个体与最泛化的个体相比,每月的存活率下降了 10%。最终,这导致了与专业觅食者相比,泛化觅食者的年存活率几乎高出 4 倍。这些结果表明,竞争是个体觅食策略的直接驱动因素,而饮食介导的适应性变化调节了随机资源环境中的种群和群落动态。此外,我们的研究结果表明,饮食的泛化是一种适应性最大化的策略,这表明可塑性觅食策略可能在物种适应环境变化的能力方面发挥着关键作用。