Suppr超能文献

晚期肝细胞癌联合选择性内放射治疗或索拉非尼单药治疗后的肝功能

Liver function after combined selective internal radiation therapy or sorafenib monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

作者信息

Ricke Jens, Schinner Regina, Seidensticker Max, Gasbarrini Antonio, van Delden Otto M, Amthauer Holger, Peynircioglu Bora, Bargellini Irene, Iezzi Roberto, De Toni Enrico N, Malfertheiner Peter, Pech Maciej, Sangro Bruno

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany.

Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2021 Dec;75(6):1387-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.037. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: SORAMIC is a previously published randomised controlled trial assessing survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received sorafenib with or without selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Based on the per-protocol (PP) population, we assessed whether the outcome of patients receiving SIRT+sorafenib vs. sorafenib alone was affected by adverse effects of SIRT on liver function.

METHODS

The PP population consisted of 109 (SIRT+sorafenib) vs. 173 patients (sorafenib alone). Comparisons were made between subgroups who achieved a significant survival benefit or trend towards improved survival with SIRT and the inverse group without a survival benefit: <65 years-old vs. ≥65 years-old, Child-Pugh 5 vs. 6, no transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) vs. prior TACE, no cirrhosis vs. cirrhosis, non-alcohol- vs. alcohol-related aetiology. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was used to monitor liver function over time during follow-up.

RESULTS

ALBI scores increased in all patient groups during follow-up. In the PP population, ALBI score increases were higher in the SIRT+sorafenib than the sorafenib arm (p = 0.0021 month 4, p <0.0001 from month 6). SIRT+sorafenib conferred a survival benefit compared to sorafenib alone in patients aged <65 years-old, those without cirrhosis, those with Child-Pugh 5, and those who had not received TACE. A higher increase in ALBI score was observed in the inverse subgroups in whom survival was not improved by adding SIRT (age ≥65 years-old, p <0.05; cirrhosis, p = 0.07; Child-Pugh 6, p <0.05; prior TACE, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

SIRT frequently has a negative, often subclinical, effect on liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, which may impair prognosis after treatment. Careful patient selection for SIRT as well as prevention of clinical and subclinical liver damage by selective treatments, high tumour uptake ratio, and medical prophylaxis could translate into better efficacy.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645 LAY SUMMARY: This study of treatments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma found that selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has an adverse effect on liver function that may affect patient outcomes. Patients should be carefully selected before they undergo SIRT and the treatment technique should be optimised for maximum protection of non-target liver parenchyma.

摘要

背景与目的

SORAMIC是一项先前发表的随机对照试验,评估接受索拉非尼联合或不联合选择性内照射治疗(SIRT)的晚期肝细胞癌患者的生存率。基于符合方案(PP)人群,我们评估了接受SIRT+索拉非尼与单独接受索拉非尼治疗的患者的结局是否受到SIRT对肝功能的不良反应的影响。

方法

PP人群包括109例接受SIRT+索拉非尼治疗的患者和173例单独接受索拉非尼治疗的患者。对通过SIRT获得显著生存获益或有生存改善趋势的亚组与未获得生存获益的相反亚组进行比较:年龄<65岁与≥65岁、Child-Pugh 5分与6分、未接受经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)与既往接受过TACE、无肝硬化与有肝硬化、非酒精性病因与酒精性病因。在随访期间使用白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分来监测肝功能随时间的变化。

结果

在随访期间,所有患者组的ALBI评分均升高。在PP人群中,SIRT+索拉非尼组的ALBI评分升高幅度高于索拉非尼单药组(第4个月时p = 0.0021,第6个月起p<0.0001)。与单独使用索拉非尼相比,SIRT+索拉非尼在年龄<65岁、无肝硬化、Child-Pugh 5分以及未接受TACE的患者中具有生存获益。在添加SIRT后生存未改善的相反亚组中观察到ALBI评分升高幅度更大(年龄≥65岁,p<0.05;有肝硬化,p = 0.07;Child-Pugh 6分,p<0.05;既往接受过TACE,p = 0.08)。

结论

SIRT经常对肝细胞癌患者的肝功能产生负面的、通常为亚临床的影响,这可能会损害治疗后的预后。仔细选择接受SIRT的患者,并通过选择性治疗、高肿瘤摄取率和药物预防来预防临床和亚临床肝损伤,可能会带来更好的疗效。

临床试验编号

EudraCT 2009-012576-27,NCT01126645 通俗概述:这项针对肝细胞癌患者治疗的研究发现,选择性内照射治疗(SIRT)对肝功能有不良影响,可能会影响患者的预后。在患者接受SIRT之前应仔细选择,并且应优化治疗技术以最大程度保护非靶肝实质。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验