Heart and Vascular Institute (A.S., J.Z., O.M., A.A., J.S.L., S.R., S.M.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA.
Department of Data and Analytics (O.M., S.M.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Sep;14(9):e007485. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007485. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend using the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk to guide statin therapy for primary prevention. Real-world data on adherence and consequences of nonadherence to the guidelines in primary are limited. We investigated the guideline-directed statin intensity (GDSI) and associated outcomes in a large health care system, stratified by ASCVD risk.
Statin prescription in patients without coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, or ischemic stroke were evaluated within a large health care network (2013-2017) using electronic medical health records. Patient categories constructed by the 10-year ASCVD risk were borderline (5%-7.4%), intermediate (7.5%-19.9%), or high (≥20%). The GDSI (before time of first event) was defined as none or any intensity for borderline, and at least moderate for intermediate and high-risk groups. Mean (±SD) time to start/change to GDSI from first interaction in health care and incident rates (per 1000 person-years) for each outcome were calculated. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios for incident ASCVD and mortality across risk categories stratified by statin utilization.
Among 282 298 patients (mean age ≈50 years), 29 134 (10.3%), 63 299 (22.4%), and 26 687 (9.5%) were categorized as borderline, intermediate, and high risk, respectively. Among intermediate and high-risk categories, 27 358 (43%) and 8300 (31%) patients did not receive any statin, respectively. Only 17 519 (65.6%) high-risk patients who were prescribed a statin received GDSI. The mean time to GDSI was ≈2 years among the intermediate and high-risk groups. At a median follow-up of 6 years, there was a graded increase in risk of ASCVD events in intermediate risk (hazard ratio=1.15 [1.07-1.24]) and high risk (hazard ratio=1.27 [1.17-1.37]) when comparing no statin use with GDSI therapy. Similarly, mortality risk among intermediate and high-risk groups was higher in no statin use versus GDSI.
In a real-world primary prevention cohort, over one-third of statin-eligible patients were not prescribed statin therapy. Among those receiving a statin, mean time to GDSI was ≈2 years. The consequences of nonadherence to guidelines are illustrated by greater incident ASCVD and mortality events. Further research can develop and optimize health care system strategies for primary prevention.
目前,美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南建议使用 10 年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险来指导他汀类药物在一级预防中的应用。关于初级保健中不遵守指南的依从性和后果的真实世界数据有限。我们在一个大型医疗保健系统中研究了他汀类药物的指导强度(GDSI)以及与 ASCVD 风险相关的结果,这些结果是分层的。
在一个大型医疗保健网络中(2013-2017 年),使用电子病历评估无冠心病、外周血管疾病或缺血性卒中的患者的他汀类药物处方。根据 10 年 ASCVD 风险构建的患者类别为边缘(5%-7.4%)、中间(7.5%-19.9%)或高(≥20%)。GDSI(首次事件前)定义为边缘类别的无或任何强度,以及中间和高风险组的至少中等强度。计算每个结果的首次医疗保健交互后的开始/改变为 GDSI 的平均(±SD)时间(每 1000 人年的发生率)和发生率(每 1000 人年的发生率)。使用 Cox 回归模型计算按他汀类药物使用分层的风险类别中 ASCVD 事件和死亡率的风险比。
在 282298 名患者中(平均年龄约为 50 岁),分别有 29134(10.3%)、63299(22.4%)和 26687(9.5%)归类为边缘、中间和高风险。在中间和高风险类别中,分别有 27358(43%)和 8300(31%)的患者未接受任何他汀类药物治疗。只有 17519 名(65.6%)高风险患者接受了 GDSI 治疗。中间和高风险组的平均 GDSI 时间约为 2 年。在中位随访 6 年后,与 GDSI 治疗相比,中间风险(风险比=1.15[1.07-1.24])和高风险(风险比=1.27[1.17-1.37])的 ASCVD 事件风险呈梯度增加。同样,中间和高风险组的死亡率在未使用他汀类药物治疗的情况下也高于 GDSI 治疗。
在现实世界的一级预防队列中,超过三分之一的他汀类药物适用患者未接受他汀类药物治疗。在接受他汀类药物治疗的患者中,平均 GDSI 时间约为 2 年。不遵守指南的后果是 ASCVD 发生率和死亡率增加。进一步的研究可以为一级预防制定和优化医疗保健系统策略。