Suppr超能文献

通过基于问题的学习中的学习问题推进批判性思维

Advancing Critical Thinking Through Learning Issues in Problem-Based Learning.

作者信息

Thompson Carol C

机构信息

Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2018 Nov 23;29(1):149-156. doi: 10.1007/s40670-018-00649-2. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Health professions educators are increasingly urged to use learning designs that promote critical thinking and the development of interpersonal competencies. Problem-based learning (PBL) has a long, albeit contested, history as a collaborative and deep think-aloud process that participants use to reach conclusions about medical cases. In order to make progress, participants must assess what they do not know and what they must learn in order to continue. Answering these learning issues (LI) requires self-direction and cognitive presence. This study analyzes the discussions that participants used in the reporting phase of the LI process in an 8-week PBL module on cardiac-renal systems. Data were drawn from 10 class sessions and analyzed for critical thinking using a model based on Garrison and Newman et al. Participants at first presented LI reports didactically but over time initiated active learning strategies. The findings indicate large increases in the numbers of LI reports in which participants engaged in collaborative thinking. There were also large increases in the amount of time devoted to critical thinking as participants aligned the LI process more closely with the intent of PBL. Participants' identity development as experts also underwent changes and the fluidity of the expert roles increased. Thoughtful design of the LI process can help learners develop the habitus of self-direction and collaborative critical thinking that they need in order to develop clinical reasoning.

摘要

健康职业教育工作者越来越多地被敦促采用促进批判性思维和人际能力发展的学习设计。基于问题的学习(PBL)作为一种协作性的深度出声思考过程,有着悠久的历史,尽管存在争议,参与者用它来得出关于医疗案例的结论。为了取得进展,参与者必须评估他们不知道的内容以及为了继续下去必须学习的内容。回答这些学习问题(LI)需要自我导向和认知存在。本研究分析了参与者在为期8周的心脏-肾脏系统PBL模块的LI过程报告阶段所进行的讨论。数据来自10次课程,并使用基于加里森和纽曼等人的模型进行批判性思维分析。最初呈现LI报告时,参与者采用的是说教方式,但随着时间的推移,他们开始采用主动学习策略。研究结果表明,参与者进行协作性思考的LI报告数量大幅增加。随着参与者使LI过程与PBL的意图更紧密地结合,用于批判性思维的时间也大幅增加。参与者作为专家的身份发展也发生了变化,专家角色的流动性增加。对LI过程进行周到的设计可以帮助学习者养成自我导向和协作性批判性思维的习惯,这是他们发展临床推理能力所需要的。

相似文献

1
Advancing Critical Thinking Through Learning Issues in Problem-Based Learning.
Med Sci Educ. 2018 Nov 23;29(1):149-156. doi: 10.1007/s40670-018-00649-2. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Evaluation of an e-PBL model to promote individual reasoning.
Med Teach. 2013;35(3):e978-83. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.717185. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
7
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
9
Knowledge Construction in Problem-Based Learning: A Lag-Sequential Analysis of Teachers' and Students' Discourse Moves.
Teach Learn Med. 2024 Aug-Sep;36(4):411-424. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2230559. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
10
Impact of a problem-based learning elective on performance in non-problem-based learning required courses.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Dec;12(12):1470-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

本文引用的文献

3
An objective structured clinical examination to assess problem-based learning.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Apr 10;76(3):44. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76344.
6
Exploration of a method to analyze group interactions in problem-based learning.
Med Teach. 2004 Aug;26(5):471-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590410001679064.
7
Building collegiality: the real value of problem-based learning.
Med Educ. 2001 Dec;35(12):1143. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01078.x.
8
Measuring critical thinking in problem-based learning discourse.
Teach Learn Med. 2001 Winter;13(1):27-35. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1301_6.
9
The impact of student-generated learning issues on individual study time and academic achievement.
Med Educ. 1999 Nov;33(11):808-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00403.x.
10
Effectiveness of problems used in problem-based learning.
Med Educ. 1997 Sep;31(5):330-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1997.00672.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验