Suppr超能文献

具有一年临床前阶段的基础课程变革及其对住院医师专业选择相关压力的影响

Fundamental Curriculum Change with 1-Year Pre-Clerkship Phase and Effect on Stress Associated with Residency Specialty Selection.

作者信息

Scudder David R, Sherry Alexander D, Jarrett Ryan T, Fernando Shanik, Kuhn Andrew W, Fleming Amy E

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN USA.

Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2019 Aug 27;29(4):1033-1042. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00800-7. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine recently changed from 2 pre-clerkship years (Traditional curriculum) to a 1.5-year pre-clerkship phase for one class (Hybrid curriculum) to a 1-year pre-clerkship phase (Curriculum 2.0). This study investigated the relationship between shortened pre-clerkship training and stress associated with selecting a residency field. The surveyed graduating medical student population included one cohort from the Traditional and Hybrid curricula, and the first two cohorts from Curriculum 2.0. The authors modeled recollected stress levels using a Zero-Inflated Linear Mixed Model with additional covariate and random effects adjustments. Specialty decision-related stress levels increased in the Hybrid curriculum by 10.208 points [ = 0.0115, 95% CI 2.293, 18.122] on a 0-100 point scale. Curriculum 2.0 students had an insignificant increase in stress of 4.062 points [ = 0.304, 95% CI - 3.690, 11.814] relative to the Traditional curriculum. Time since starting medical school and time when a specialty was chosen were the largest factors associated with stress. While this study only evaluated a single facet of the potential downstream effects of curricular change, these data should inspire confidence for reform efforts as a significant increase in specialty decision-related stress present in Hybrid curriculum resolved in both cohorts of Curriculum 2.0.

摘要

范德堡大学医学院最近进行了课程改革,从之前的2年预科阶段(传统课程)转变为一个班级的1.5年预科阶段(混合课程),再到1年预科阶段(课程2.0)。本研究调查了缩短预科培训与选择住院医师培训领域相关压力之间的关系。参与调查的毕业医学生群体包括来自传统课程和混合课程的一个队列,以及课程2.0的前两个队列。作者使用零膨胀线性混合模型对回忆起的压力水平进行建模,并进行了额外的协变量和随机效应调整。在0至100分的量表上,混合课程中与专业决策相关的压力水平增加了10.208分[=0.0115,95%置信区间2.293,18.122]。相对于传统课程,课程2.0的学生压力增加了4.062分,但不显著[=0.304,95%置信区间-3.690,11.814]。自开始医学院学习以来的时间以及选择专业的时间是与压力相关的最大因素。虽然本研究仅评估了课程改革潜在下游影响的一个方面,但这些数据应为改革努力带来信心,因为混合课程中与专业决策相关的压力显著增加在课程2.0的两个队列中都得到了解决。

相似文献

1
Fundamental Curriculum Change with 1-Year Pre-Clerkship Phase and Effect on Stress Associated with Residency Specialty Selection.
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Aug 27;29(4):1033-1042. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00800-7. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Clerkship Experiences During Medical School: Influence on Specialty Decision.
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Mar 31;31(3):1109-1114. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01281-3. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Development and evaluation of a pre-clerkship spiral curriculum: data from three medical school classes.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2167258. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2167258.
4
Integrating evidence-based medicine skills into a medical school curriculum: a quantitative outcomes assessment.
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):249-250. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111391. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
Relationships Matter: Enhancing Trainee Development with a (Simple) Clerkship Curriculum Reform.
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Jan-Mar;31(1):76-86. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1479264. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores.
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):330-336. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1721293. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
An Analysis of Curricular Structures in MD-PhD Programs in the United States.
Acad Med. 2025 Jan 1;100(1):72-77. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005857. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Perspectives from two recent medical school graduates on exposure to pathology during undergraduate medical education: A narrative inquiry.
Acad Pathol. 2023 Oct 4;10(4):100094. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100094. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
3
Virtual Microscopy Goes Global: The Images Are Virtual and the Problems Are Real.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1421:79-124. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-30379-1_5.

本文引用的文献

2
Framing Medicine as a Moral Practice: An Introductory Medical School Course.
Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1310-1314. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002301.
3
Repeal and Replace? A Note of Caution for Medical School Curriculum Reformers.
Acad Med. 2018 Oct;93(10):1425-1427. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002219.
4
Understanding Clerkship Student Roles in the Context of 21st-Century Healthcare Systems and Curricular Reform.
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):367-376. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1433044. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
5
The Impact of a Revised Curriculum on Academic Motivation, Burnout, and Quality of Life Among Medical Students.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2017 Jul 31;4:2382120517721901. doi: 10.1177/2382120517721901. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
8
Predicting United States Medical Licensure Examination Step 2 clinical knowledge scores from previous academic indicators.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Jun 19;8:385-391. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S138557. eCollection 2017.
10
Competency milestones for medical students: Design, implementation, and analysis at one medical school.
Med Teach. 2017 May;39(5):494-504. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1299924. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验