Suppr超能文献

学习解剖学中的湿标本、塑化标本或塑料模型:本科医学生的认知

Wet Specimens, Plastinated Specimens, or Plastic Models in Learning Anatomy: Perception of Undergraduate Medical Students.

作者信息

Atwa Hani, Dafalla Salah, Kamal Doaa

机构信息

College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.

Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ring Road, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2021 Jun 2;31(4):1479-1486. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01343-6. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methods of teaching anatomy have shown major change as the medical undergraduate curriculum became more challenging. Traditional teaching methods like dissection and wet specimens are nowadays widely replaced by anatomical models, plastination, and technology-enhanced applications.

AIM

To explore the perception of undergraduate students of three methods of learning anatomy, which are wet specimens, plastinated specimens, and plastic models.

METHODS

This is a descriptive, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study that included a sample of 268 male and female undergraduate medical students of the third and fourth study years at Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies in Saudi Arabia.

RESULTS

Students in this study preferred wet specimens in regard to motivation to gaining anatomical knowledge in clinical context and usefulness for surgical career. On the other hand, they preferred plastinated specimens when it comes to feasibility of use, ability to differentiate between structures, and understanding complex structures.

CONCLUSION

Although the findings in general refer to preferring the use of wet specimens, no one modality seems to be enough for effectively learning anatomy. A combination of various modalities can provide the best benefit for medical students in this regard.

摘要

背景

随着医学本科课程变得更具挑战性,解剖学教学方法已发生重大变化。如今,解剖和湿标本等传统教学方法已被解剖模型、塑化标本和技术增强型应用广泛取代。

目的

探讨本科学生对三种解剖学学习方法的看法,这三种方法分别是湿标本、塑化标本和塑料模型。

方法

这是一项基于问卷调查的描述性横断面研究,样本包括沙特阿拉伯伊本·西那国立医学院第三和第四学年的268名男女本科医学生。

结果

在本研究中,学生在获取临床背景下解剖学知识的动机以及对外科职业生涯的有用性方面更喜欢湿标本。另一方面,在使用的可行性、区分结构的能力以及理解复杂结构方面,他们更喜欢塑化标本。

结论

尽管总体研究结果表明更喜欢使用湿标本,但似乎没有一种单一的方式足以有效地学习解剖学。在这方面,多种方式的结合可以为医学生带来最大益处。

相似文献

9
How useful is plastination in learning anatomy?塑化技术在解剖学学习中实用性如何?
J Vet Med Educ. 2007 Spring;34(2):172-6. doi: 10.3138/jvme.34.2.172.

引用本文的文献

3
Virtual Dissection and Learning Anatomy: A Medical Student's Perspective.虚拟解剖与解剖学学习:一名医学生的视角
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Oct 5;33(6):1427-1428. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01901-0. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

6
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
7
Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach.人体解剖学:让学生告诉我们怎么教。
Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Jul-Aug;7(4):262-72. doi: 10.1002/ase.1424. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
9
The prevention and handling of the missing data.数据缺失的预防和处理。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 May;64(5):402-6. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.5.402. Epub 2013 May 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验