Suppr超能文献

一项基于远程医疗小组干预以增加多发性硬化症患者身体活动量的随机对照试验:eFIT。

RCT of a Telehealth Group-Based Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: eFIT.

作者信息

Leavitt Victoria M, Aguerre Ines M, Lee Nancy, Riley Claire S, De Jager Philip L, Bloom Sharonna

机构信息

Translational Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory (VML), Multiple Sclerosis Center (VML, IMA, CSR, PLDJ, SB), Center for Translational & Computational Neuroimmunology (IMA, CSR, PLDJ), Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center; and Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine (NL), Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York.

出版信息

Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;11(4):291-297. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001039.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to determine whether participation in a group-based structured telehealth intervention increases physical activity in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

In this parallel-arms trial, all study procedures were administered remotely. Adults diagnosed with MS (any subtype) were randomized to one of two 12-week (1 h/wk) active conditions: eFIT, online moderated structured groups; or eJournal, online independent journaling. For comparison, a treatment-as-usual (TAU; i.e., no eFIT/eJournal) group was enrolled. The primary outcome was feasibility (completion and adherence). The secondary efficacy outcomes included self-reported physical activity level (International Physical Activity Questionnaire, IPAQ).

RESULTS

Participants were 37 adults with MS. The sample was diverse: 66.7% female; age range 23-64 years; 17.5% Hispanic, 12.5% Black; and progressive and relapsing-remitting disease subtypes. Regarding feasibility, 70.7% completed; average adherence was 74.9%. Physical activity in active groups increased by 34.2% (baseline IPAQ = 2,406.8 ± 1,959.7, follow-up = 3,229.4 ± 2,575.2) and decreased in the TAU group by 17.4% (baseline = 2,519.9 ± 1,500.1, follow-up = 2,081.2 ± 1,814.9); group × time interaction was not statistically significant [F(2,25) = 1.467, = 0.250; partial η = 0.105].

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth represents an accessible, acceptable vehicle to deliver targeted behavioral treatments to a neurologic population. eFIT may be an effective intervention for increasing physical activity, a historically intractable treatment target, in individuals with MS. In addition, these results provide evidence for feasibility of conducting fully remote clinical trial research.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that for people with MS, participation in a group-based structured telehealth intervention compared with TAU resulted in a (non-significant) increase in self-reported physical activity level. The percentage of participants who completed follow-up questionnaires did not differ between groups. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03829267).

摘要

目的

开展一项初步随机对照试验,以确定参与基于小组的结构化远程医疗干预是否能增加多发性硬化症(MS)患者的身体活动。

方法

在这项平行组试验中,所有研究程序均通过远程方式进行。被诊断为MS(任何亚型)的成年人被随机分配到两种为期12周(每周1小时)的积极干预组之一:eFIT,在线有主持人的结构化小组;或eJournal,在线独立记录。为作比较,纳入了常规治疗(TAU;即不进行eFIT/eJournal)组。主要结局是可行性(完成情况和依从性)。次要疗效结局包括自我报告的身体活动水平(国际身体活动问卷,IPAQ)。

结果

参与者为37名患有MS的成年人。样本具有多样性:66.7%为女性;年龄范围23 - 64岁;17.5%为西班牙裔,12.5%为黑人;疾病亚型包括进展型和复发缓解型。关于可行性,70.7%的人完成了干预;平均依从性为74.9%。积极干预组的身体活动增加了34.2%(基线IPAQ = 2406.8±1959.7,随访 = 3229.4±2575.2),而TAU组下降了17.4%(基线 = 2519.9±1500.1,随访 = 2081.2±1814.9);组×时间交互作用无统计学意义[F(2,25) = 1.467,P = 0.250;偏η² = 0.105]。

结论

远程医疗是为神经疾病患者提供有针对性行为治疗的一种可及且可接受的方式。eFIT可能是增加MS患者身体活动的有效干预措施,而身体活动一直是难以攻克的治疗目标。此外,这些结果为开展完全远程的临床试验研究的可行性提供了证据。

证据分类

本研究提供了II级证据,即对于MS患者,与TAU相比,参与基于小组的结构化远程医疗干预导致自我报告的身体活动水平有(无统计学意义的)增加。两组完成随访问卷的参与者百分比无差异。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03829267)注册。

相似文献

3
Erratum.勘误
Mult Scler. 2016 Oct;22(12):NP9-NP11. doi: 10.1177/1352458515585718. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
5

本文引用的文献

5
National estimates of self-reported sitting time in adults with multiple sclerosis.对多发性硬化症成年患者自我报告的久坐时间的全国性估计。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2018 Jan 19;4(1):2055217318754368. doi: 10.1177/2055217318754368. eCollection 2018 Jan-Mar.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验