Tootla Hafsah D, Bamford Colleen, Centner Chad M, Moodley Clinton
Division of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
National Health Laboratory Service, Microbiology, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
S Afr J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 15;36(1):244. doi: 10.4102/sajid.v36i1.244. eCollection 2021.
Culture remains the diagnostic standard for bacteraemia but is limited by time to identification, prior antibiotics and bacterial autolysis. Culture-independent methods for detecting include PCR and antigen tests. We evaluated an antigen test on blood culture broth for the rapid detection of bacteraemia.
We collected 212 signal-positive blood cultures, with gram-positive cocci in pairs, chains or with uncertain morphology. The BinaxNOW urinary antigen test, Gram stain, culture and PCR were performed on all samples. Diagnostic accuracy of the antigen test and Gram stain with gram-positive cocci in pairs were compared with culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the composite of culture and PCR.
was isolated in 26% of samples, 66% cultured other gram-positive organisms and 8% of samples had no growth. Sensitivity and negative predictive values of the antigen test were 100%, specificity and positive predictive values were 87% - 88% and 76% - 81%, but increased to 93% - 96% and 96% - 98% when applied to subsets with gram-positive cocci in pairs, or history compatible with respiratory illness or meningitis. Sensitivity (69% - 75%) and specificity (81%) of Gram stain (gram-positive cocci in pairs) were lower than the antigen test even when applied to the same subsets.
Accurate and rapid diagnosis of bacteraemia is challenging. Specificity of this antigen test is limited by cross-reactivity with other gram-positive organisms, but could be improved if Gram stain morphology and clinical history are available. The antigen test is a useful adjunct for rapid diagnosis of bacteraemia.
培养仍然是菌血症的诊断标准,但受鉴定时间、先前使用的抗生素和细菌自溶的限制。用于检测的非培养方法包括聚合酶链反应(PCR)和抗原检测。我们评估了一种用于血培养肉汤的抗原检测方法,以快速检测菌血症。
我们收集了212份信号阳性血培养物,其中革兰氏阳性球菌呈双球菌、链状或形态不确定。对所有样本进行了BinaxNOW尿抗原检测、革兰氏染色、培养和PCR检测。将抗原检测和革兰氏染色(双球菌形态的革兰氏阳性球菌)对双球菌形态的革兰氏阳性球菌的诊断准确性与培养、聚合酶链反应(PCR)以及培养和PCR的综合结果进行比较。
26%的样本分离出[具体细菌名称未给出],66%培养出其他革兰氏阳性菌,8%的样本无生长。抗原检测的敏感性和阴性预测值为100%,特异性和阳性预测值为87% - 88%和76% - 81%,但应用于双球菌形态的革兰氏阳性球菌亚组、或与呼吸道疾病或脑膜炎相符的病史时,分别提高到93% - 96%和96% - 98%。革兰氏染色(双球菌形态的革兰氏阳性球菌)的敏感性(69% - 75%)和特异性(81%)即使应用于相同亚组也低于抗原检测。
准确快速诊断菌血症具有挑战性。这种抗原检测的特异性受与其他革兰氏阳性菌交叉反应的限制,但如果有革兰氏染色形态和临床病史,特异性可能会提高。抗原检测是快速诊断菌血症的有用辅助手段。