Suppr超能文献

[基层医疗中多重用药老年患者的处方适宜性:整群随机对照试验PHARM-PC]

[Prescription appropriateness in elderly patients with polypharmacy in primary care: Cluster-randomized controlled trial PHARM-PC].

作者信息

Martínez-Sotelo Jesús, Pinteño-Blanco Manuel, García-Ramos Rosario, Cadavid-Torres María Isabel

机构信息

Servicio de Farmacia. Hospital Comarcal de Inca, Inca, España.

Servicio de Farmacia. Hospital Comarcal de Inca, Inca, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2021 Dec;53(10):102124. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102124. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led systematic review of medications on: potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), health outcomes and costs.

DESIGN

Prospective, open, controlled and cluster-randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Six primary care clinics from Balearic Islands.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-two clusters (21 per group), and 549 patients aged ≥65 years and ≥5 chronic medications were included; of which 277 were allocated to Intervention Group (IG) and 272 to Control Group (CG). Patients were excluded if they were: institutionalized, temporarily displaced, routinely monitored under private healthcare, or home care.

INTERVENTION

PIM detection by the pharmacist using a combination of explicit and implicit methods; and communication of the most appropriate therapeutic strategies to the physician.

MEASUREMENTS

Proportion of patients with PIM and mean number of PIM/patient (main outcomes); and morbidity, mortality, and costs (secondary outcomes) were assessed.

STATISTICAL PLAN

Following an intention-to-treat approach, quantitative and qualitative outcomes variables were compared by T-Student and Chi-square tests, respectively. Results were providing as difference in proportions for qualitative outcomes and difference in means for quantitative outcomes with respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

After intervention, proportion of patients with PIM decreased by 13.7% (95% CI: 9.3; 18.2) more in IG than CG. Mean number of PIM/patient and mean cost of PIM/patient decreased by 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32; 0.54) and 72.11€ (95% CI: 26.15; 118.06) more in IG than CG, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in morbidity, mortality or costs of healthcare resources.

CONCLUSIONS

PIM detection and recommendations provided by pharmacist could contribute to reduce significantly PIM and drug expenditure; but without reaching statistically significant differences in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resources costs.

摘要

目的

评估由药剂师主导的药物系统评价对潜在不适当用药(PIM)、健康结局和成本的有效性。

设计

前瞻性、开放性、对照和整群随机临床试验。

地点

巴利阿里群岛的六家初级保健诊所。

参与者

纳入42个群组(每组21个),549名年龄≥65岁且服用≥5种慢性药物的患者;其中277名被分配到干预组(IG),272名被分配到对照组(CG)。如果患者符合以下情况则被排除:入住机构、临时转移、在私人医疗保健下接受常规监测或接受家庭护理。

干预措施

药剂师使用明确和隐含方法相结合的方式检测PIM;并向医生传达最合适的治疗策略。

测量指标

评估PIM患者的比例和每位患者的PIM平均数量(主要结局);以及发病率、死亡率和成本(次要结局)。

统计计划

采用意向性分析方法,分别通过t检验和卡方检验比较定量和定性结局变量。结果以定性结局比例差异和定量结局均值差异以及各自的95%置信区间(95%CI)表示。

结果

干预后,IG组PIM患者比例比CG组下降了13.7%(95%CI:9.3;18.2)。IG组每位患者的PIM平均数量和每位患者的PIM平均成本分别比CG组下降了0.43(95%CI:0.32;0.54)和72.11欧元(95%CI:26.15;118.06)。然而,在发病率、死亡率或医疗资源成本方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

结论

药剂师进行的PIM检测和建议有助于显著减少PIM和药物支出;但在发病率、死亡率和医疗资源成本方面未达到统计学上的显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2d3/8424444/f99962ec762b/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验