• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修复与替换有缺陷的直接修复体:美国牙医的横断面研究。

Repair versus replacement of defective direct restorations: A cross-sectional study among US dentists.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Nov;152(11):927-935. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2021.05.017
PMID:34489065
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Repair increases the longevity of restorations and is well-accepted by patients. In this study, the authors assessed the acceptance of dental restoration repair by dentists and determined the main variables of repair versus replacement of defective restorations.

METHODS

A 15-item questionnaire was developed and distributed electronically to the American Dental Association Clinical Evaluators panel members (n = 785) during a 2-week period in 2019. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 387 respondents, 83.7% stated that they repair defective restorations, and 16% stated that they always replace them. Reasons to forego a restoration repair among dentists who perform repairs included defect size and carious lesion extension (42%) and negative personal experience or lack of success (37.9%). However, the latter was considerably higher for dentists who do not perform repairs (60.7%). The most commonly cited patient-related reason and tooth condition to repair restorations were limited patient finances (67%) and noncarious marginal defects (86%), respectively. Neither sex nor age group was significantly associated with the practice of restoration repair (P = .925 and P = .369, respectively). However, sole proprietors were more likely to perform repairs than those in an employee, associate, or contractor practice setting (P = .008). The most significant reason to forego restoration was negative experience or lack of success (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration repair is considered a treatment option for managing defective restorations. Negative personal experience or lack of success and practice setting influenced the dentists' decision to repair or replace a defective restoration.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Understanding dentists' clinical challenges and practice environment is necessary when advocating for this approach.

摘要

背景

修复可以延长修复体的使用寿命,并且深受患者的认可。本研究评估了牙医对牙体修复体修复的接受程度,并确定了修复与更换有缺陷的修复体的主要变量。

方法

在 2019 年的两周内,通过电子方式向美国牙科协会临床评估员小组(n=785)成员分发了一份包含 15 个问题的问卷。进行了描述性、双变量和多变量分析。

结果

在 387 名答复者中,83.7%表示他们会修复有缺陷的修复体,而 16%表示他们总是更换它们。对于进行修复的牙医来说,放弃修复的原因包括缺损大小和龋坏延伸(42%)以及个人负面经历或缺乏成功(37.9%)。然而,对于不进行修复的牙医,后者的比例要高得多(60.7%)。最常被引用的与患者相关的修复原因和牙齿状况分别是患者经济有限(67%)和非龋性边缘缺损(86%)。性别和年龄组与修复体修复的实践均无显著相关性(P=0.925 和 P=0.369)。然而,独资经营者比员工、合伙人或承包商更有可能进行修复(P=0.008)。放弃修复的最主要原因是个人负面经历或缺乏成功(P=0.002)。

结论

修复被认为是处理有缺陷修复体的一种治疗选择。个人负面经历或缺乏成功和实践环境影响了牙医修复或更换有缺陷修复体的决策。

实用意义

了解牙医的临床挑战和实践环境对于倡导这种方法是必要的。

相似文献

1
Repair versus replacement of defective direct restorations: A cross-sectional study among US dentists.修复与替换有缺陷的直接修复体:美国牙医的横断面研究。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Nov;152(11):927-935. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
2
Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.由口腔实践研究网络中的牙医进行有缺陷修复体的修复或更换。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Jun;143(6):593-601. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0238.
3
Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the Public Dental Service in Norway.修复有缺陷的复合修复体。挪威公共牙科服务牙医问卷调查研究。
J Dent. 2016 Sep;52:50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Defective restoration repair or replacement: An American Dental Association Clinical Evaluators Panel survey.修复、重建或替换的缺陷:美国牙科学会临床评估小组调查。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Apr;152(4):329-330.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.01.011.
5
Repair versus replacement of defective direct dental restorations: A multinational cross-sectional study with meta-analysis.有缺陷的直接牙齿修复体的修复与替换:一项荟萃分析的多国横断面研究。
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105096. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105096. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
How dentists diagnose and treat defective restorations: evidence from the dental practice-based research network.牙医如何诊断和治疗有缺陷的修复体:来自基于实践的牙科研究网络的证据。
Oper Dent. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):664-73. doi: 10.2341/08-131-C.
7
The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration: findings from the National Dental PBRN.修复或更换有缺陷修复体的决定受最初放置该修复体者的影响:来自国家牙科实践-based研究网络的发现。
J Dent. 2014 Dec;42(12):1528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
The Post-Amalgam Era: Norwegian Dentists' Experiences with Composite Resins and Repair of Defective Amalgam Restorations.汞合金补牙材料使用后的时代:挪威牙医使用复合树脂补牙及修复汞合金补牙材料缺陷的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Apr 22;13(4):441. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040441.
9
The Decision to Repair or Replace a Defective Restoration is Affected by Who Placed the Original Restoration: Findings from the National Dental PBRN.修复或更换有缺陷修复体的决策受最初放置修复体者的影响:来自国家牙科PBRN的研究结果
Tex Dent J. 2015 Jul;132(7):448-58.
10
Understanding the management and teaching of dental restoration repair: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys.理解口腔修复修复的管理和教学:调查的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The current attitudes and practices of dentists in Australia towards composite repair: A cross-sectional survey study.澳大利亚牙医对复合树脂修复的当前态度和实践:一项横断面调查研究。
Aust Dent J. 2025 Mar;70(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/adj.13041. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
Clinical Difficulties Related to Direct Composite Restorations: A Multinational Survey.与直接复合树脂修复相关的临床难题:一项多国调查。
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):797-806. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.06.012. Epub 2024 Jul 23.