Pesquisador associado, Observatório História e Saúde/Casa de Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz.Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brasil
Pesquisador, Observatório História e Saúde/ Casa de Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz. Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brasil
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2021 Jul-Sep;28(3):643-659. doi: 10.1590/S0104-59702021000300002.
Drawing on personal documents from Ernesto Geisel and press reports, this article discusses the background to the decision by Brazil not to take part in the International Conference on Primary Health Care held in Alma-Ata, USSR, in 1978. It is suggested that the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had different views on the importance of the meeting in Kazakhstan, resulting in their submitting conflicting recommendations to the president of Brazil. It also investigates how the precepts consolidated in the Declaration of Alma-Ata were shared among Brazilian health specialists of different ideological persuasions, even to the point of serving as a blueprint for programs devised under the dictatorship, with implications for the development of later initiatives.
本文利用 Ernesto Geisel 的个人文件和新闻报道,探讨了巴西决定不参加 1978 年在苏联阿拉木图举行的国际初级卫生保健会议的背景。本文认为,巴西卫生部和外交部对在哈萨克斯坦举行的会议的重要性存在不同看法,这导致他们向巴西总统提交了相互冲突的建议。本文还调查了《阿拉木图宣言》中确立的原则是如何在不同意识形态倾向的巴西卫生专家中得到认同的,甚至被用作独裁政权下制定的计划的蓝图,这对后来的倡议的发展产生了影响。