Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的前列腺切除术后和自我管理:一项横断面研究。

Postprostatectomy Incontinence and Self-management for Urinary Incontinence After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Cross-sectional Study.

机构信息

Longmei Si, RN, ET, Urology Department, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.

Yanming Ding, RN, Nursing Department, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48(5):440-446. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000793.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), self-management strategies for managing incontinence, and factors influencing self-management.

DESIGN

A descriptive, cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

The sample comprising 37 males with prostate cancer who underwent LRP was recruited within first 2 years. The study setting was a tertiary care hospital in Beijing, China. An additional 78 individuals who responded to a mailed invitation sent from September 2015 to October 2016 participated in the study.

METHODS

Participants completed a questionnaire that queried demographic and pertinent clinical data. The questionnaire also included 2 validated instruments. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) was used to assess urinary incontinence (UI) following radical prostatectomy and its severity. The Strategy and Effectiveness of Symptom Self-Management questionnaire of Postprostatectomy Incontinence (SESSM-PPI) was used to evaluate self-management of UI, including strategies used and their perceived effectiveness.

RESULTS

Data analysis was based on 115 respondents who completed all components of the questionnaire; 95 (82.6%) indicated having UI. Forty-one patients (43.2%) indicated mild UI, 47 (49.5%) indicated moderate UI, and 7 (7.4%) indicated severe UI. The mean score of the SESSM-PPI was 14.04 ± 7.92, indicating a low level of self-management.The top 5 strategies with moderate effectiveness were in the following order: "use pads or adult diapers"; "pelvic floor muscle training"; "avoid extracting heavy objects"; "avoid drinking"; and "eat more fruit to prevent constipation." The Spearman correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between the frequency of use of self-management strategies and incontinence severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary incontinence is prevalent among males with prostate cancer managed by radical prostatectomy. Respondents tended to report mild to moderate UI severity. Self-management of UI among respondents is low.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述腹腔镜前列腺根治性切除术(LRP)后前列腺切除术后尿失禁(PPI)、管理尿失禁的自我管理策略以及影响自我管理的因素。

设计

描述性、横断面研究。

受试者和设置

该样本包括 37 名接受 LRP 的前列腺癌男性,在术后 2 年内招募。研究地点是中国北京的一家三级保健医院。2015 年 9 月至 2016 年 10 月期间,还通过邮寄邀请信额外招募了 78 名参与者。

方法

参与者完成了一份问卷,其中询问了人口统计学和相关临床数据。该问卷还包括 2 个经过验证的工具。国际尿失禁咨询问卷-尿失禁简短表(ICIQ-UI SF)用于评估前列腺根治性切除术后尿失禁及其严重程度。前列腺切除术后尿失禁自我管理策略和有效性问卷(SESSM-PPI)用于评估尿失禁的自我管理,包括使用的策略及其感知效果。

结果

数据分析基于完成问卷所有部分的 115 名应答者;95 名(82.6%)表示存在尿失禁。41 名患者(43.2%)表示轻度尿失禁,47 名(49.5%)表示中度尿失禁,7 名(7.4%)表示重度尿失禁。SESSM-PPI 的平均得分为 14.04 ± 7.92,表明自我管理水平较低。效果中等的前 5 种策略依次为:“使用护垫或成人尿布”;“盆底肌肉训练”;“避免提取重物”;“避免饮酒”;和“多吃水果预防便秘”。Spearman 相关性分析显示,自我管理策略的使用频率与尿失禁严重程度呈正相关。

结论

接受前列腺根治性切除术治疗的前列腺癌男性中,尿失禁较为普遍。应答者倾向于报告轻度至中度尿失禁严重程度。应答者对尿失禁的自我管理水平较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验