MUC Research, Clinical Research Organization (CRO), Waltherstr. 32, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Bonn University Hospital, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
AIDS Res Ther. 2021 Sep 8;18(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12981-021-00384-6.
The DUALIS study showed that switching to boosted darunavir (bDRV) plus dolutegravir (DTG; 2DR) was non-inferior to continuous bDRV plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs; 3DR) in treatment-experienced virologically suppressed people living with HIV (PLWH). We analyzed virologic outcomes with respect to treatment history and HIV drug resistance.
Post hoc analysis of a randomized trial.
Main inclusion criteria were an HIV RNA level < 50 copies/mL for ≥ 24 weeks and no resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors or bDRV. Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were interpreted using the Stanford HIVdb mutation list. Outcomes measures were 48-week virologic response (HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL, FDA snapshot) and HIV RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL (including discontinuation due to a lack of efficacy or reasons other than adverse events and HIV RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL, referred to as snapshot non-response).
The analysis population included 263 patients (2DR: 131, 3DR: 132): 90.1% males; median age, 48 years; CD4 + T-cell nadir < 200/µl, 47.0%; ≥ 2 treatment changes, 27.4%; NRTI, non-NRTI (NNRTI), and major protease inhibitor (PI) RAMs in 9.5%, 14.4%, and 3.4%, respectively. In patients with RAMs in the 2DR and 3DR groups, virologic response rates were 87.8% and 96.0%, respectively; the corresponding rates in those without RAMs were 85.7% and 81.8%. RAMs were unrelated to virologic non-response in either group. No treatment-emergent RAMs were observed.
DTG + bDRV is an effective treatment option without the risk of treatment-emergent resistance for PLWH on suppressive first- or further-line treatment with or without evidence of pre-existing NRTI, NNRTI, or PI RAMs.
EUDRA-CT Number 2015-000360-34; registered 07 April 2015; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2015-000360-34/DE .
DUALIS 研究表明,对于经治的病毒学抑制的 HIV 感染者(PLWH),与持续接受 boosted darunavir(bDRV)加 dolutegravir(DTG;2DR)相比,转换为 bDRV 加 dolutegravir(DTG;2DR)并不劣于持续接受 bDRV 加 2 种核苷/核苷酸逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs;3DR)。我们根据治疗史和 HIV 耐药情况分析了病毒学结局。
一项随机试验的事后分析。
主要纳入标准为 HIV RNA 水平<50 拷贝/ml 持续 24 周以上且无整合酶链转移抑制剂或 bDRV 耐药。使用斯坦福 HIVdb 突变列表解释耐药相关突变(RAMs)。结局测量为 48 周的病毒学应答(HIV RNA<50 拷贝/ml,FDA 快照)和 HIV RNA≥50 拷贝/ml(包括因缺乏疗效或除不良事件和 HIV RNA≥50 拷贝/ml 以外的原因而停药,称为快照无应答)。
分析人群包括 263 例患者(2DR:131 例,3DR:132 例):90.1%为男性;中位年龄 48 岁;CD4+T 细胞计数<200/µl,47.0%;≥2 次治疗改变,27.4%;NRTI、非 NRTI(NNRTI)和主要蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)RAMs 的发生率分别为 9.5%、14.4%和 3.4%。在 2DR 和 3DR 组有 RAMs 的患者中,病毒学应答率分别为 87.8%和 96.0%;无 RAMs 的患者相应的应答率分别为 85.7%和 81.8%。两组中 RAMs 与病毒学无应答无关。未观察到治疗出现的 RAMs。
对于接受抑制性一线或进一步治疗且存在或不存在预先存在的 NRTI、NNRTI 或 PI RAMs 的 PLWH,DTG+bDRV 是一种有效的治疗选择,无治疗出现耐药的风险。
EUDRA-CT 编号 2015-000360-34;注册日期 2015 年 4 月 7 日;https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2015-000360-34/DE。