难治性癫痫患儿医疗资源利用情况比较:迷走神经刺激与药物治疗队列研究

Comparison of healthcare resource utilization in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy: Vagus nerve stimulation and medical treatment cohorts.

作者信息

Zhang Lu, Wu Joyce Y, Lam Sandi K

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Ann & Robert Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E Chicago Ave, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E Chicago Ave, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Oct;123:108281. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108281. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Refractory epilepsy imposes a substantial burden on affected patients, families, and healthcare system. In terms of treating seizures in children, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been proved to be comparable to that of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This study compared healthcare resource utilization between pediatric patients treated with AEDs only and AEDs plus VNS.

METHODS

Pediatric patients diagnosed with refractory epilepsy between the 1st of January 2011 and the 31st of December 2016 were identified from the Pediatric Health Information System Database. Patients treated with AEDs only or AEDs plus VNS were included in the study and were followed up from one year before to two years after the date when defined criteria for refractory epilepsy were met. The difference-in-difference approach along with the hurdle model was used to compare the changes in healthcare resource utilization over time between patients treated with AEDs only and AEDs plus VNS.

RESULTS

The study included 1502 patients treated with AEDs plus VNS and 4541 patients treated with AEDs only. There was a difference in post-index all-cause and epilepsy-related inpatient visits compared to the pre-index period: inpatient hospitalizations were decreased in the AEDs plus VNS cohort, and increased in the AEDs only cohort. There was no significant difference in the pre-index to post-index change for all-cause and epilepsy-related emergency department visits between the two treatment cohorts. For outpatient encounters in the initial post-index period, patients treated with AEDs plus VNS had significantly higher increase in all-cause and epilepsy-related outpatient visits compared to the AEDs only cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to those treated with AEDs only, pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy treated with AEDs plus VNS have fewer inpatient visits and more outpatient visits within a 2-year follow-up. Given the lower acuity of care in outpatient versus inpatient settings, this study can inform treatment choices for children with refractory epilepsy.

摘要

目的

难治性癫痫给患者、家庭及医疗系统带来沉重负担。在儿童癫痫发作治疗方面,迷走神经刺激术(VNS)已被证明与抗癫痫药物(AEDs)效果相当。本研究比较了仅接受AEDs治疗的儿科患者与接受AEDs加VNS治疗的儿科患者的医疗资源利用情况。

方法

从儿科健康信息系统数据库中识别出2011年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间诊断为难治性癫痫的儿科患者。仅接受AEDs治疗或接受AEDs加VNS治疗的患者纳入研究,并从达到难治性癫痫定义标准之日前一年至后两年进行随访。采用双重差分法和门槛模型比较仅接受AEDs治疗的患者与接受AEDs加VNS治疗的患者随时间推移医疗资源利用的变化。

结果

该研究纳入了1502例接受AEDs加VNS治疗的患者和4541例仅接受AEDs治疗的患者。与索引前时期相比,索引后全因及癫痫相关住院就诊存在差异:AEDs加VNS组住院率下降,仅AEDs组住院率上升。两个治疗组在索引前至索引后全因及癫痫相关急诊科就诊变化方面无显著差异。在索引后初始阶段的门诊就诊中,接受AEDs加VNS治疗的患者全因及癫痫相关门诊就诊增加幅度显著高于仅接受AEDs治疗的组。

结论

与仅接受AEDs治疗的患者相比,接受AEDs加VNS治疗的难治性癫痫儿科患者在2年随访期内住院就诊次数更少,门诊就诊次数更多。鉴于门诊与住院环境中护理的严重程度较低,本研究可为难治性癫痫儿童的治疗选择提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索