Martins Christine-Men, de Moraes Adrielly-Regina, Cruz Ana-Julia-Menoti, Barboza Lalleska-Caroline-Pereira, Batista Victor-Eduardo-de Souza, Mori Graziela-Garrido, do Prado Rosana-Leal, Matos Janine, Herrera Bruno, Lacerda Priscila-Bruna-Gonçalves, Andrada Ana-Cristina
DDS, MSc, PhD. Professor at Dental School of Presidente Prudente, University of Western São Paulo - UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Undergraduate at Dental School of Presidente Prudente, University of Western São Paulo - UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Aug 1;13(8):e745-e754. doi: 10.4317/jced.57774. eCollection 2021 Aug.
This study assesses and compares the knowledge level of endodontists (ENDs) and general dental practitioners (GPs) from Brazil and United States of America (USA) in the diagnosis and treatment of internal and external inflammatory root resorptions through periapical radiographic (PA) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations.
A cross-sectional online questionnaire-based survey was presented to the volunteers containing questions regarding personal and professional profile, as well as three clinical cases of internal and external inflammatory root resorption. A series of multiple-choice questions about the diagnosis and treatment options were surveyed. The data collected was analysed by the Chi-square test with Yates correction with a significance level of 5 %.
Most answers were considered adequate when all three questions about the diagnosis and all two questions relating to the treatment were answered accurately. A total of 374 dentists answered the survey (n: 229 from Brazil vs. 145 from USA) being 41% END and 59% GP. END presented higher level of knowledge than GP regarding to diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory root resorptions both in Brazil and USA (<0.05); USA presented higher level of adequate responses than Brazil (<0.05).
END achieved a level of knowledge of the diagnosis and treatment of root resorption superior to the GP. Comparing the results obtained in both countries, it was observed that the USA had a higher correct response rate than Brazil. Internal root resorption, external root resorption, management, diagnosis, treatment.
本研究评估并比较了巴西和美国的牙髓病医生(ENDs)与普通牙科医生(GPs)通过根尖片(PA)和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检查诊断和治疗内、外炎性牙根吸收的知识水平。
向志愿者发放了一份基于在线问卷的横断面调查,问卷包含有关个人和专业背景的问题,以及三个内、外炎性牙根吸收的临床病例。调查了一系列关于诊断和治疗选择的多项选择题。收集的数据采用经Yates校正的卡方检验进行分析,显著性水平为5%。
当关于诊断的所有三个问题以及与治疗相关的所有两个问题都回答正确时,大多数答案被认为是充分的。共有374名牙医回答了调查(n:巴西229名,美国145名),其中41%为牙髓病医生,59%为普通牙科医生。在巴西和美国,牙髓病医生在炎性牙根吸收的诊断和治疗方面的知识水平均高于普通牙科医生(<0.05);美国的充分回答水平高于巴西(<0.05)。
牙髓病医生在牙根吸收的诊断和治疗方面的知识水平高于普通牙科医生。比较两国的结果发现,美国的正确回答率高于巴西。内牙根吸收、外牙根吸收、管理、诊断、治疗。