Immunoregulation Research Center, University of Shahed, North kargar street, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Shahed, Tehran, Iran.
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Feb;41(2):533-539. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05879-1. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
Dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) are known as two major types of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IMMs). During the past years, growing data strongly suggest the clinical significance of myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) and myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs). The present study aimed to determine the profile of MSAs and MAAs, subsequently to address the clinical significance of these autoantibodies in Iranian myositis patients.
In this cross-sectional study, 28 DM and 24 PM patients were entered. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected by direct examination and patients' medical record. The existence of MSAs and MAAs was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence then using immunoblotting (FA 1510-1005-1, DL 1530-1601-4 G; Euroimmun, Germany). Data were analyzed using the SPSS software (v22; SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA).
The mean age of the patients was 46.18 ± 12.95 years and male/female ratio was 28.8/71.2. Autoantibodies were positive in 63.46% of myositis patients. Interestingly, anti-TIF1γ and anti-PL7 were significantly associated with malignancy (P < 0.001, P = 0.008; respectively). The existence of autoantibody and anti-Jo1 had significant relation with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (P = 0.034, P = 0.006; respectively). Joint involvements including arthritis and arthralgia were significantly associated with anti-Ro52 and anti-Jo1 (P = 0.04, P = 0.02; respectively).
Taken together, it can be concluded that certain myositis autoantibodies present clinical significance which is in line with the literature. The use of these autoantibodies as biomarkers by line blotting along with indirect immunofluorescence facilitates diagnosis of inflammatory myopathies and makes it more accurate as well as better management of myositis patients if used based on a science-based manner. Key Points • Identification of MSAs and MAAs facilitates the diagnosis of inflammatory myopathies and provides better myositis patient's management if used according to a science-based manner. • Anti-rod and ring antibody was detected in a patient with ovarian cancer-induced dermatomyositis. • Malignancy and ILD are integrated parts of myositis which can be associated with MSAs and MAAs.
皮肌炎(DM)和多发性肌炎(PM)是两种已知的特发性炎症性肌病(IIM)。在过去的几年中,越来越多的数据强烈表明肌炎相关自身抗体(MAAs)和肌炎特异性自身抗体(MSAs)的临床意义。本研究旨在确定 MSAs 和 MAAs 的特征,并随后探讨这些自身抗体在伊朗肌炎患者中的临床意义。
在这项横断面研究中,纳入了 28 例 DM 和 24 例 PM 患者。通过直接检查和患者病历收集人口统计学和临床特征。通过间接免疫荧光法然后使用免疫印迹法(FA 1510-1005-1、DL 1530-1601-4 G;Euroimmun,德国)评估 MSAs 和 MAAs 的存在。使用 SPSS 软件(v22;SPSS Inc.,芝加哥,IL,USA)分析数据。
患者的平均年龄为 46.18±12.95 岁,男女比例为 28.8/71.2。肌炎患者中自身抗体阳性率为 63.46%。有趣的是,抗 TIF1γ 和抗 PL7 与恶性肿瘤显著相关(P<0.001,P=0.008;分别)。自身抗体的存在和抗 Jo1 与间质性肺病(ILD)有显著关系(P=0.034,P=0.006;分别)。关节炎和关节痛等关节受累与抗 Ro52 和抗 Jo1 显著相关(P=0.04,P=0.02;分别)。
总之,可以得出结论,某些肌炎自身抗体具有临床意义,这与文献一致。通过线印迹与间接免疫荧光一起使用这些自身抗体作为生物标志物,有助于炎症性肌病的诊断,并使其更加准确,以及更好地管理肌炎患者,如果基于科学的方式使用。关键点 • 鉴定 MSAs 和 MAAs 有助于炎症性肌病的诊断,并为更好地管理肌炎患者提供依据,如果根据科学的方式使用。 • 在卵巢癌诱导的皮肌炎患者中检测到抗杆和抗环抗体。 • 恶性肿瘤和 ILD 是肌炎的组成部分,可与 MSAs 和 MAAs 相关。