• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开腹与腹腔镜下结直肠癌肝转移灶切除术的疗效比较:一项基于匹配患者人群的荟萃分析。

Open versus laparoscopic liver resection of colorectal metastases: a meta-analysis of matched patient populations.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.

Dept. of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;191(4):1531-1538. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02780-3. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-021-02780-3
PMID:34535883
Abstract

In recent years, the management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has evolved significantly. Laparoscopic liver resection is increasingly being performed, despite a lack of major randomized controlled trial evidence or widespread international consensus. The objective of this review was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes following open and laparoscopic CRLM resection. A systematic review of comparative matched population studies was performed. Evaluated endpoints included surgical outcomes and survival outcomes. Twelve studies were included in this review, reporting on 3095 patients. R0 (negative margins) rates were higher in the laparoscopic CRLM group (89.3% versus 86.9%). In addition, laparoscopic resection was associated with less blood loss (486 mls versus 648 mls, p ≤ 0.0001*) and reduced blood transfusion rates (6.7% vs. 12.2%, OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.08-4.19, p = 0.03*). Major complication rates were higher in the open CRLM group (12.5% vs. 8.1%, OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.30-2.33, p = 0.03*), as was overall hospital length of stay (median 7 versus 5.5 days, p = 0.001*). Perioperative mortality was similar between both groups, and there was no significance in 5-year overall survival for open or laparoscopic CRLM resection groups (58% and 61% respectively). Laparoscopic CRLM resection is associated with less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, major complications, and overall hospital length of stay with comparable oncological outcome.

摘要

近年来,结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)的治疗管理发生了显著变化。尽管缺乏大型随机对照试验证据或国际广泛共识,但腹腔镜肝切除术的应用越来越多。本综述的目的是比较开腹和腹腔镜 CRLM 切除术后的短期和长期结果。对比较匹配人群研究进行了系统回顾。评估的终点包括手术结果和生存结果。本综述纳入了 12 项研究,共报道了 3095 例患者。腹腔镜 CRLM 组的 R0(阴性切缘)率更高(89.3%对 86.9%)。此外,腹腔镜切除与较少的出血量(486 毫升对 648 毫升,p≤0.0001*)和较低的输血率(6.7%对 12.2%,OR 2.13,95%CI 1.08-4.19,p=0.03*)相关。开腹 CRLM 组的主要并发症发生率更高(12.5%对 8.1%,OR 1.74,95%CI 1.30-2.33,p=0.03*),总住院时间也更长(中位数 7 天对 5.5 天,p=0.001*)。两组的围手术期死亡率相似,开腹或腹腔镜 CRLM 切除组的 5 年总生存率无显著差异(分别为 58%和 61%)。腹腔镜 CRLM 切除术与较少的出血量、较低的输血率、主要并发症和总住院时间相关,同时具有相似的肿瘤学结果。

相似文献

1
Open versus laparoscopic liver resection of colorectal metastases: a meta-analysis of matched patient populations.开腹与腹腔镜下结直肠癌肝转移灶切除术的疗效比较:一项基于匹配患者人群的荟萃分析。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;191(4):1531-1538. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02780-3. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
2
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
3
Timing of resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.同步结直肠肝转移切除术的时机:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jul;126(1):175-188. doi: 10.1002/jso.26868.
4
Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的近期和远期疗效:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 24;20(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02818-5.
5
Mid- and low-rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open treatment-short- and long-term results. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.中低位直肠癌:腹腔镜与开腹治疗——短期和长期结果。随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jan;37(1):71-99. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04048-9. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
6
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
7
Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection.腹腔镜结直肠切除术的短期益处。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD003145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2.
8
Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的腹腔镜阴道悬吊术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD002239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub2.
9
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝肿瘤的比较:一项基于个体患者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2018 May;163(5):985-995. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.020. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Versus Open Caudate Lobe Resection: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.腹腔镜与开放尾状叶切除术:一项对比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 21;14(13):4421. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134421.
2
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis: an umbrella review.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移:一项伞状综述
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 15;14:1340430. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1340430. eCollection 2024.
3
Laparoscopic liver resection as a treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

本文引用的文献

1
The ABCdE score for PREdicting Lithotripsy Assistance during transcystic Bile duct Exploration by Laparoendoscopy (PRE-LABEL).腹腔镜经胆囊管胆管探查术中预测碎石辅助的 ABCdE 评分(PRE-LABEL)。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):5971-5979. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08082-6. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
2
A prospective, randomized controlled study of the safety and efficacy of gasless bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) robotic thyroidectomy.一项关于无气双侧腋窝入路(BABA)机器人甲状腺切除术的安全性和有效性的前瞻性、随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4846-4856. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07262-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
3
腹腔镜肝切除术作为治疗肝内胆管细胞癌的一种选择。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):869-878. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01803-9. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
4
Minimal Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter German StuDoQ|Liver Registry-Based Cohort Analysis in Germany.结直肠癌肝转移的微创手术与开放手术:一项基于德国多中心StuDoQ|肝脏登记的队列分析
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Nov 2;4(4):e350. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000350. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Outcomes and Patient Selection in Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for HCC and Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝癌及结直肠癌肝转移的疗效及患者选择
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 12;15(4):1179. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041179.
Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.
腹腔镜肝切除术推荐意见:在盛冈召开的第二届国际共识会议报告
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):619-29. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184.
4
Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors.转移性结直肠癌肝切除术后的生存:预后因素的综述和荟萃分析。
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:283-301. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S34285. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
5
Colorectal liver metastases.结直肠癌肝转移
Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:285840. doi: 10.1155/2011/285840. Epub 2011 Jun 6.