• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体力活动和久坐行为在巴西成年人中的时间趋势和社会人口不平等:2003 年至 2019 年的全国调查。

Time Trends and Sociodemographic Inequalities in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors Among Brazilian Adults: National Surveys from 2003 to 2019.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2021 Sep 21;18(11):1332-1341. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0156.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.2021-0156
PMID:34548416
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors analyzed time trends and sociodemographic inequalities in different physical activity and sedentary behavior domains between 2003 and 2019.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of data from 5 cross-sectional Brazilian epidemiological surveys (World Health Survey-2003, National Household Sample Survey-2008/2015, and Brazilian Health Survey-2013/2019) conducted among a nationally representative sample of Brazilian adults. The authors used data on different domains of physical activity (leisure, commute, total transport, and total physical activity) and sedentary behavior (TV viewing and other types of screens) that were available in the different surveys. Gender, age group, country region, ethnicity, type of area and city, and quintiles of income and educational achievement were used as sociodemographic correlates.

RESULTS

The prevalence of leisure-time physical activity increased over time (2008: 7.0% vs 2019: 26.5%). There was also an increased trend of social inequality in leisure-time physical activity. A trend of reduction was observed for active commuting (2008: 35.0% vs 2019: 21.8%), while total transport physical activity was stable (2013: 49.5% vs 2019: 49.6%). Directions of findings were opposite for sedentary behavior, with reduced trend for >3 hours per day of TV viewing (2008: 34.8% vs 2019: 21.8%) and increased trend for >3 hours per day of other types of screen time (2008: 6.4% vs 2019: 22.2%).

CONCLUSION

A positive trend exists in leisure-time physical activity, but there was also an increase in social inequalities for physical activity in Brazil.

摘要

背景

作者分析了 2003 年至 2019 年期间不同身体活动和久坐行为领域的时间趋势和社会人口学不平等现象。

方法

对巴西成年人进行的五次横断面流行病学调查(2003 年世界卫生调查、2008/2015 年全国家庭抽样调查和 2013/2019 年巴西健康调查)的数据进行二次分析。作者使用了不同领域的身体活动(休闲、通勤、总交通和总身体活动)和久坐行为(电视观看和其他类型的屏幕时间)的数据,这些数据在不同的调查中都有。性别、年龄组、国家地区、种族、区域和城市类型以及收入和教育程度的五分位数被用作社会人口学相关因素。

结果

休闲时间身体活动的流行率随时间增加(2008 年:7.0%,2019 年:26.5%)。休闲时间身体活动的社会不平等也呈上升趋势。积极通勤的趋势呈下降趋势(2008 年:35.0%,2019 年:21.8%),而总交通身体活动则保持稳定(2013 年:49.5%,2019 年:49.6%)。久坐行为的发现方向相反,每天观看电视超过 3 小时的趋势呈下降趋势(2008 年:34.8%,2019 年:21.8%),每天观看其他类型屏幕时间超过 3 小时的趋势呈上升趋势(2008 年:6.4%,2019 年:22.2%)。

结论

巴西的休闲时间身体活动呈积极趋势,但身体活动的社会不平等也有所增加。

相似文献

1
Time Trends and Sociodemographic Inequalities in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors Among Brazilian Adults: National Surveys from 2003 to 2019.体力活动和久坐行为在巴西成年人中的时间趋势和社会人口不平等:2003 年至 2019 年的全国调查。
J Phys Act Health. 2021 Sep 21;18(11):1332-1341. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0156.
2
Sociodemographic inequalities in leisure-time physical activity and active commuting to school in Brazilian adolescents: National School Health Survey (PeNSE 2009, 2012, and 2015).巴西青少年在休闲时间体育活动及步行或骑自行车上学方面的社会人口学不平等:全国学校健康调查(2009年、2012年和2015年)
Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34(4):e00037917. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00037917. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
Profile of leisure-time physical activity and sedentary behavior in adults in Brazil: a nationwide survey, 2019.巴西成年人休闲时间体力活动和久坐行为特征:2019 年全国调查。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2023 Aug 11;32(2):e2023168. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222023000200016. eCollection 2023.
4
Joint associations of physical activity and sedentary behaviors with body mass index: results from a time use survey of US adults.体力活动和久坐行为与体重指数的联合关联:来自美国成年人时间利用调查的结果。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Dec;33(12):1427-36. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.174.
5
[Leisure-time physical activity and sedentary behaviors among Chinese adults in 2010].[2010年中国成年人的休闲体育活动与久坐行为]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 May;46(5):399-403.
6
Active commuting reduces sociodemographic differences in adherence to recommendations derived from leisure-time physical activity among Brazilian adults.积极通勤可减少巴西成年人在遵循休闲体育活动建议方面的社会人口学差异。
Public Health. 2016 May;134:12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
Physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns and sociodemographic correlates in 116,982 adults from six South American countries: the South American physical activity and sedentary behavior network (SAPASEN).在来自六个南美洲国家的 116982 名成年人中,体力活动和久坐行为模式及其与社会人口学的相关性:南美洲体力活动和久坐行为网络 (SAPASEN)。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Aug 20;16(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0839-9.
8
Socioeconomic inequalities in physical activity in Brazil: a pooled cross-sectional analysis from 2013 to 2019.巴西身体活动方面的社会经济不平等:2013年至2019年的汇总横断面分析
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Aug 23;20(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01533-z.
9
Clustering of physical inactivity in leisure, work, commuting and household domains among Brazilian adults.巴西成年人在休闲、工作、通勤和家庭领域中不活跃的聚类现象。
Public Health. 2013 Jun;127(6):530-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.02.013. Epub 2013 May 22.
10
Leisure time physical activity reduces the association between TV-viewing and depressive symptoms: A large study among 59,401 Brazilian adults.闲暇时间体育活动可降低看电视与抑郁症状之间的关联:巴西 59401 名成年人的一项大型研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 1;252:310-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.066. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Household physical activity contributions to total physical activity and its associations with cardiometabolic risk factors: a Brazilian adult population analysis.家庭体力活动对总体力活动的贡献及其与心血管代谢危险因素的关联:巴西成年人群分析。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):2553. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23756-3.
2
Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors associated with chronic musculoskeletal disorders in Brazil: a network analysis of a population-based study involving 87,648 Brazilian adults.巴西慢性肌肉骨骼疾病相关的社会经济和生活方式因素:一项基于人群的研究的网络分析,该研究涉及87648名巴西成年人。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 30;16:20406223251350884. doi: 10.1177/20406223251350884. eCollection 2025.
3
The 6 Pillars of Lifestyle Medicine and Prevalence of Cardiovascular and Cardiometabolic Diseases in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Study Involving 88,531 Adults.
生活方式医学的六大支柱与巴西心血管和心脏代谢疾病的患病率:一项涉及88531名成年人的基于人群的横断面研究。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025 Jun 5:15598276251348170. doi: 10.1177/15598276251348170.
4
Cross national patterns in educational inequalities in functional limitations among middle aged and older adults at two time points.两个时间点上中年及老年成年人功能受限方面教育不平等的跨国模式。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Nov 8;28:101725. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101725. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Multiple substance use and associated factors in transgender women and travestis: findings from the TransOdara Study, Brazil.跨性别女性和易装癖者的多种物质使用及相关因素:巴西 TransOdara 研究的结果。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 19;27Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e240011.supl.1. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720230011.supl.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Use of electronic devices in leisure time modifies the prevalence and factors associated with sedentary behavior derived exclusively from excessive television viewing among Brazilian adults.闲暇时间使用电子设备改变了巴西成年人中与久坐行为相关的流行率和因素,而久坐行为原本仅与过度看电视有关。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):1602. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16517-7.
7
Profile of leisure-time physical activity and sedentary behavior in adults in Brazil: a nationwide survey, 2019.巴西成年人休闲时间体力活动和久坐行为特征:2019 年全国调查。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2023 Aug 11;32(2):e2023168. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222023000200016. eCollection 2023.
8
Recovery shape of physical activity after COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情后身体活动的恢复形态。
J Sport Health Sci. 2023 Jul;12(4):501-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
9
Perception of the Neighborhood Environment, Physical Activity by Domain and Sitting Time in Brazilian Adults.巴西成年人对邻里环境、各领域身体活动和久坐时间的感知。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 26;19(23):15744. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315744.
10
Refining index to measure physical activity inequality: which group of the population is the most vulnerable?衡量体力活动不平等的指数:哪个群体最脆弱?
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Aug 31;21(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01725-1.